Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Democratic infighting intensifies, Hagel allies fire back at the White House
Hotair ^ | 11/30/2014 | NOAH ROTHMAN

Posted on 11/30/2014 3:41:05 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Among Democrats, fighting is breaking out all over.

The Senate’s third-ranking Democrat, Chuck Schumer (D-NY), is hurling criticisms toward the White House over Barack Obama’s handling of the recession and his myopic and politically ruinous obsession with reforming the nation’s health care system amid that economic downturn.

In response, the White House took what Reuters called the “unusual step” of publicly pledging to veto an overdue plan to reform the nation’s tax code which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has been in the process of negotiating with House Republicans.

When Obama announced his intention to extend legal status to millions of illegal immigrants by executive fiat, it also exposed fissures within the Democratic Party. A number of Senate Democrats, including Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), and Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), expressed their dissatisfaction with Obama’s actions in clear and uncertain terms.

Manchin, Donnelly, and Heitkamp had previously spoken in support Sen. Mary Landrieu’s (D-LA) failed effort to pass a measure approving the construction of the Keystone Pipeline against the wishes of the White House. Alongside Sens. Jon Tester (D-MT), these centrist Democrats could emerge as a bloc of votes that would help the incoming majority Republican Party advance legislation through the Senate.

“There is clearly a lot of unhappiness and a lot of mistrust that exists between the president and his congressional party,” Rutgers University professor Ross Baker told Reuters.

The gradual implosion of the Democratic Party’s formerly vaunted unity is not merely limited to Capitol Hill. The squabbling is coming from inside the White House.

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel might have gone quietly. Reports that few have reason to doubt indicate that he was as frustrated with the president’s management as were his last two predecessors. The even-tempered former Nebraska politician has never been one to backbite. He may have been content to shuffle off stage and keep his unfiltered thoughts about Obama to himself if the administration had not tried to cast him as the source of so many of its present difficulties on the defense policy front. But the political service Hagel could perform as a symbol of an administration sloughing off encumbering detritus proved too tempting for the White House.

“Hagel never really proved himself,” NBC reporter Andrea Mitchell revealed while summarizing the thoughts of one or several of her sources within the administration.

“Mr. Hagel has often had problems articulating his thoughts — or administration policy — in an effective manner,” The New York Times echoed.

In a subsequent Times dispatch, one administration official said that the president felt he would benefit politically from the removal of one of his Cabinet members. “So he went for the low-hanging fruit,” the official said casually.

The president’s aides went on, apparently, to cast Hagel in the role of scapegoat.

“Aides said Mr. Obama made the decision to remove his defense secretary on Friday after weeks of rising tensions over a variety of issues, including what administration officials said were Mr. Hagel’s delays in transferring detainees from the military prison in Guantanamo Bay and a dispute with Susan E. Rice, the national security advisor, over Syria policy.”

For a time, sources close to Hagel had kept their side of the story to themselves. Someone described as a “senior defense official” told CBS that Hagel was “fed up with micromanagement” from the administration, but that was the extent of Hagel’s attempt at self-defense. That was not to last.

In an illuminating piece in The Wall Street Journal published last week, individuals close to Hagel revealed that he was only leaving his post after a “year of frustrations.” That piece included a number of damning quotes that indicate that Obama, not Hagel, is the source of the administration’s woes.

“One of the things that Hagel values most is clarity,” said a confidante of the defense secretary. “That’s not something that this White House has always done well.”

James Jeffrey, who served as Mr. Obama’s ambassador in Turkey and Iraq, said of Mr. Hagel: “His removal won’t make things better because he was not the source of the problem. The problems seem to be closer to the president.”

Moreover, the report alleges, Hagel served as Obama’s unsolicited Casandra. He reportedly issued a series of prophetic warnings about the deteriorating international security environment that went unheeded.

Sources close to Hagel suggest that he became disillusioned when the president cancelled a plan to strike pro-Assad targets in Syria just one day before they were slated to begin. The Pentagon chief’s exasperation grew when he reportedly warned the president to take firm and prompt measures which would communicate to Vladimir Putin that his aggression in Ukraine would not go unopposed. “Moscow – not the Middle East – posed the most serious long-term threat to international security, Mr. Hagel told the president,” The Journal reported.

“Mr. Hagel tried to move the ball forward with Mr. Obama directly. In a private meeting in late July, he warned Mr. Obama that the U.S. wasn’t focused enough on Russia, and was lurching from crisis to crisis without direction, according to a senior defense official,” the report revealed.

All of Hagel’s warnings went ignored. America is now entering the conflict in Syria too late and with conditions far less favorable than they were in the autumn of 2013. Russia has expanded the conflict in Ukraine, and threatens to destabilize more of that country and other former Soviet Republics. Hagel may not be the farsighted sage that this report portrays him to be, but it is clear his side of the story of his time in the White House is a bit more complicated than the administration would like to suggest.

If nothing else, it seems likely that Hagel will be the third consecutive secretary of defense serving under Obama to write an unfavorable account of the president’s managerial style after leaving office.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; Syria; US: Indiana; US: Louisiana; US: Missouri; US: Montana; US: Nevada; US: New York; US: North Dakota; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: andreamitchell; chuckhagel; chuckschumer; clairemccaskill; defense; democrats; hagel; harryreid; heidiheitkamp; indiana; iraq; jamesjeffrey; joedonnelly; joemanchin; jontester; louisiana; missouri; montana; nbc; nebraska; nevada; newyork; noahrothman; northdakota; rossbaker; russia; rutgers; syria; turkey; ukraine; upchuckschumer; westvirginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2014 3:41:05 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Schumer is a big ally of the Clintons, is he not? Why now after six years of silence is Chucky going on the attack on the administration? Methinks the Clinton machine sent him out there as the opening salvo to separate Hillary’s association with the president as she gears up for 2016.


2 posted on 11/30/2014 3:50:35 PM PST by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

I think u are bang on.


3 posted on 11/30/2014 4:01:19 PM PST by CincyRichieRich (In Times of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Becomes a Revolutionary Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“If nothing else, it seems likely that Hagel will be the third consecutive secretary of defense serving under Obama to write an unfavorable account of the president’s managerial style after leaving office.”

Name of first Sec. Def. escapes me at this particular moment, but writing their memoirs of their time in office under “The Revered, and almighty Obama the Magnificent Lord of the Nation, and the Whole of the Universe” is tantamount to writing a resume for their personal futures. There’s no way they can get jobs having been intensely blamed for Obama’s failures otherwise.


4 posted on 11/30/2014 4:05:36 PM PST by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Donate here!


✓ FReepathon begins October, 1, 2014
✓ Happy Halloween! October, 31, 2014
✓ Happy Thanksgiving! November, 27, 2014
✓ Season's Greetings! November, 28, 2014
✓ FReepathon is still on! November, 30, 2014
__ Please donate today.
Tomorrow is December 1, 2014
We're going to need a big push to
wrap this up. Let's git 'er done.

5 posted on 11/30/2014 4:05:51 PM PST by RedMDer (I don't listen to Liars but when I do I know it's Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Any “national security team” that includes susan rice is in trouble right from the start.


6 posted on 11/30/2014 4:14:01 PM PST by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It will be interesting to see whether Biden resigns and announces his candidacy in an attempt to undercut Hillary. It would be a VERY smart move on his part, which is why he wouldn’t do it. He’s incapable of intelligence.

(GOD it would be a gift if he got the Dem nomination though)


7 posted on 11/30/2014 4:57:25 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 43north

Although I’m not a Michael Savage fan, I remember his words from a few years back that Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice and a 3rd woman were running this country. It might have been Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, but I’m not sure. Seems his words were spot on as I believe these stupid women are running things and making a mess of this world.


8 posted on 11/30/2014 4:58:08 PM PST by Catsrus (al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

“If nothing else, it seems likely that Hagel will be the third consecutive secretary of defense serving under Obama to write an unfavorable account of the president’s managerial style after leaving office.”


Gee, could the reason be that Obama couldn’t give a rat’s behind about National Security? Obama probably measures National Security effectiveness in terms of how much foreign aid is going to Africa or the Palestinian Authority. Or how many Middle Eastern governments the Muslim Brotherhood controls. And is there ANY ally that “The One” hasn’t pi$$ed off?

Obama has achieved the stupifying feat of making even Jimmuh Carter look good.


9 posted on 11/30/2014 5:01:47 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

Third woman? Barbara Boxer or Nancy Pelosi.


10 posted on 11/30/2014 5:02:31 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

I suspect you are right.

2016 could be Chicago Mob vs Clinton Crime Family part II.


11 posted on 11/30/2014 5:05:00 PM PST by nascarnation (Impeach, Convict, Deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

“”Name of first Sec. Def. escapes me at this particular moment””

Robert Gates....


12 posted on 11/30/2014 5:08:19 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

“”Name of first Sec. Def. escapes me at this particular moment””

Robert Gates


13 posted on 11/30/2014 5:12:15 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

WHOOPS>>>>>>>>>


14 posted on 11/30/2014 5:12:34 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus
I remember his words from a few years back that Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice and a 3rd woman were running this country. It might have been Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, but I’m not sure.

The third woman, I believe, was Michelle Robinson Obama.

15 posted on 11/30/2014 5:18:52 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

Thank you. Appreciate you unclogging my brainary tract.


16 posted on 11/30/2014 5:20:02 PM PST by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
“Hagel never really proved himself,” [media shill] Andrea Mitchell revealed... “Mr. Hagel has often had problems articulating his thoughts — or administration policy — in an effective manner,” The New York Times [media shills] echoed... one administration official said that the president felt he would benefit politically from the removal of one of his Cabinet members. “So he went for the low-hanging fruit,” the official said casually.
It's hilarious that Hagel is characterized as a Demwit, instead of the RINO that he is.
The president’s aides went on, apparently, to cast Hagel in the role of scapegoat... “...after weeks of rising tensions over a variety of issues... delays in transferring detainees from the military prison in Guantanamo Bay and a dispute with Susan E. Rice... over Syria policy.”
Wow, didn't know he had it in him.
In an illuminating piece in The Wall Street Journal published last week... a number of damning quotes that indicate that Obama, not Hagel, is the source of the administration’s woes.
Duh!
James Jeffrey, who served as Mr. Obama’s ambassador in Turkey and Iraq, said of Mr. Hagel: “His removal won’t make things better because he was not the source of the problem. The problems seem to be closer to the president.”
Rice, Jarrett.
Hagel served as Obama’s unsolicited Casandra... he became disillusioned when the president cancelled a plan to strike pro-Assad targets in Syria just one day before they were slated to begin... warned the president to take firm and prompt measures which would communicate to Vladimir Putin that his aggression in Ukraine would not go unopposed.
He has more flexibility now that the 2012 election is over.
17 posted on 11/30/2014 5:38:28 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

As a Nebraskan, I am ashamed of Hagel.

He has no skill, no initiative, no honor and no balls.

Move to Iowa shithead.


18 posted on 11/30/2014 5:52:28 PM PST by bakeneko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bakeneko
He has no skill, no initiative, no honor and no balls.

All of which made him a perfect fit in the Obama clown show.

The idiot was a fall guy from day one and he was too stupid even to recognize that.

19 posted on 11/30/2014 5:58:37 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

How about that he’s not on our side and they refuse to see it. That’s why they are continually baffled by his anti American actions and why things are so chaotic. He doesn’t put America first like he is supposed to.


20 posted on 11/30/2014 6:02:07 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson