Posted on 09/10/2018 12:54:19 PM PDT by detective
I watched nearly all of the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Right away, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley stated clearly that the role of a judge is to rule based on the law regardless of his or her personal view of the outcome.
He also stated that since Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburgs confirmation hearing in 1993, every nominee has agreed to decline to discuss his or her personal opinion of the correctness of any given court precedent. He stated firmly that requesting a judge to do so would essentially be asking for a promise to rule in a certain way in exchange for a confirmation vote, which is both unfair and unethical. With great persistence despite remarkably determined efforts, Kavanaugh honored this standard.
I was struck by how Kavanaugh answered questions related to the various cases and social issues presented to him. He carefully began each response by citing court precedent relevant to the issue. When asked about his decision-making in court cases, he was equally careful to distinguish his personal views from his dedication to judicial independence, following the law as it is written.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
They should be dismissed from the court for asking something like that. That’s like trying to demand that a judge break the law if circumstances warrant. Kavanaugh is the judge/justice & can’t have somebody else telling him what to do.
Actually, the democrats are demanding that he promises to help them overthrow the first and second amendments and the constitution itself.
HOMOSEXUAL, because there's nothing GAY about it.
It won’t be long before democrats demand everyone have a homosexual affair to prove they aren’t anti-gay.
Democrat Senators demand Kavanaugh vote Left. There, I fixed it.
Democrats have no right to demand a damn thing. How about the GOP demand the RATs shut the **** up!
I can’t wait for the indictments to drop on all the coup plotters, seditionists, and MSM leakers and enablers. Then we’ll see what demands the Marxist RATs want to make as they head to prison.
How queer, I know religious rights are protected by the Constitution but Democrats sure don’t support them.
If you thought "Bake the Cake!" was bad...
More accurately, Democrats demand that Justice Kavanaugh fall into their lame trap... if he answers with personal opinion, he gets to be accused of making a decision before hearing a case (the literal definition of prejudice), as well as opening the door for recusal demands... if he does not give personal opinions, then he is being evasive... and if he answers properly and substantively, they take his comments out of context and making broad accusations anyway (see the abortion pill statement).
They have nothing to offer America anymore, and are hoping to fool enough voters for NOV. Nothing more.
Bullying! Its what they do.
Eww. The colon docs are already busy as it is. If every guy BF'd another guy then the increase in diseases would jump immeasurably. Particularly colo-rectal diseases.
That's the little talked about fact of male homosexuality; all the diseases and medical problems that come with doing that unnatural act. Women who engage in that behavior also experience a much higher prevalence of these diseases. That back hole is an exit only. Or to put it another way; that sh!t will kill you.
Colon cancer is in the top 3 most common cancers. That kind of behavior increases that risk greatly.
The Gay Mafia is now after him.
Why are candidates for high office required to pledge allegiance to the “Gay”?
PHOOEY!!!!
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. (Article VI, Section 3)
Give the democraps what they want and call them all faggots! That would be a high compliment in their eyes wouldn’t it?
A Democrat goes to St Peter and says I want into heaven. St Peter ask him if he was a queer or supported queers and the Democrat stated yes on both accounts. Well that poses a problem for you. The Democrat said the US congress under the Kenyan ruled it okay for me to be a queer. St Peter’s answer was the US congress and the Kenyan were representing Lucifer go talk to him
Give Harris credit for at least looking like a normal person. Booker is odd looking and acts like a lunatic. I dont see even the libtard nominating him
I wish some Senator had asked Kavanaugh if Ginsburg should have recused herself from the same-sex mirage hearing, as she had performed many of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.