How the British fought terror in Jenin

Jerusalem Post ^ | 18 April 2002 | Rafael Medoff

[Asmodeus]

How the British fought terror in Jenin
By Rafael Medoff

(April 18) 'Demolishing the homes of Arab civilians... Shooting handcuffed prisoners... Forcing local Arabs to test areas where mines may have been planted..."

These sound like the sort of accusations made by British and other European officials concerning Israel's recent actions in Jenin. In fact, they are descriptions from official British documents concerning the methods used by the British authorities to combat Palestinian Arab terrorism in Jenin and elsewhere in 1938.

The documents were declassified by London in 1989. They provide details of the British Mandatory government's response to the assassination of a British district commissioner by a Palestinian Arab terrorist in Jenin in the summer of 1938.

Even after the suspected assassin was captured (and then shot dead while allegedly trying to escape), the British authorities decided that "a large portion of the town should be blown up" as punishment. On August 25 of that year, a British convoy brought 4,200 kilos of explosives to Jenin for that purpose.

In the Jenin operation and on other occasions, local Arabs were forced to drive "mine-sweeping taxis" ahead of British vehicles in areas where Palestinian Arab terrorists were believed to have planted mines, in order "to reduce [British] landmine casualties."

The British authorities frequently used these and similar methods to combat Palestinian Arab terrorism in the late 1930s.

BRITISH forces responded to the presence of terrorists in the Arab village of Miar, north of Haifa, by blowing up house after house in October 1938.

"When the troops left, there was little else remaining of the once-busy village except a pile of mangled masonry," The New York Times reported.

The declassified documents refer to an incident in Jaffa in which a handcuffed prisoner was shot by the British police.

Under Emergency Regulation 19b, the British Mandate government could demolish any house located in a village where terrorists resided, even if that particular house had no direct connection to terrorist activity. Mandate official Hugh Foot later recalled: "When we thought that a village was harboring rebels, we'd go there and mark one of the large houses. Then, if an incident was traced to that village, we'd blow up the house we'd marked."

The High Commissioner for Palestine, Harold MacMichael, defended the practice: "The provision is drastic, but the situation has demanded drastic powers."

MacMichael was furious over what he called the "grossly exaggerated accusations" that England's critics were circulating concerning British anti-terror tactics in Palestine. Arab allegations that British soldiers gouged out the eyes of Arab prisoners were quoted prominently in the Nazi German press and elsewhere.

The declassified documents also record discussions among officials of the Colonial Office concerning the rightness or wrongness of the anti-terror methods used in Palestine. Lord Dufferin remarked: "British lives are being lost and I don't think that we, from the security of Whitehall, can protest squeamishly about measures taken by the men in the frontline."

Sir John Shuckburgh defended the tactics on the grounds that the British were confronted "not with a chivalrous opponent playing the game according to the rules, but with gangsters and murderers."

There were many differences between British policy in the 1930s and Israeli policy today, but one stands out - the British, faced with a level of Palestinian Arab terrorism considerably less lethal than that which Israel faces today, utilized anti-terror methods considerably harsher than those used by Israeli forces.

[joesnuffy]

Before the socialist globalist press could spin their "destruction of the west" little webs

[CorranH96]

Proves my theory that the Brits and everyone else in the EU needs to mind their business and let the Israelis take care of their terrorist problem.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Good find!

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Islamic_Violence

Click here: Islamic_Violence

[Ann Archy]

This is SWEEEEET! Also they need to keep showing the AERIAL view of Jenin....very small area was destroyed in a very large space. Picture a piece of pepperoni on a LARGE pizza...it was NOT the entire camp.

[Real Cynic No More]

Maybe the atrocities attributed to the British in Mel Gibson's "Braveheart" and "The Patriot" weren't far from the truth after all?

[TYVets]

Was there ever any doubt?

[dalebert]

Might be a good idea to post this on some British sites.

[Asmodeus]

Ann Archy: "This is SWEEEEET! Also they need to keep showing the AERIAL view of Jenin....very small area was destroyed in a very large space."

______________________

From http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/670162/posts (quotes & pictures)

Jenin "Let's get things in perspective here - that is not a massacre."

"This is a massacre:" (emphasis his) "Victims of the Dresden bombing raid." (emphasis his)

"On the 13th February 1945, 773 Avro Lancasters bombed Dresden. During the next two days the USAAF sent over 527 heavy bombers to follow up the RAF attack. Dresden was nearly totally destroyed. As a result of the firestorm it was afterwards impossible to count the number of victims. Recent research suggest that 135,000 were killed but some German sources have argued that it was over 250,000. Whatever the figure, it was probably greater than the 51,509 British civilians killed by the Luftwaffe during the whole of the Second World War and the 70,000 immediate deaths at Hiroshima after the dropping of the first atom bomb on 6th August 1945."

[Dark Wing]

A Brit "do as I say not as I do" ping.

[Tauzero]

And the US did horrible things to some American Indians.

And don't forget the Romans, who once judged Judea simply ungovernable and slaughtered many.

Is there a point?

[Ann Archy]

THANKS!! The aerial view that I saw was a bigger view of Jenin from further away so the destroyed part looked even SMALLER!!

[TheHeterodoxConservative]

Question:

Did the British actions, heavy-handed as they apparently were, stop Palestinian terrorism?