One thing you can be sure of is that the Biden administration’s definition of emergency will be overly broad and basically allow for abortion on demand provided a physician has agreed there is a danger not just to the mother’s life but her health as well. The E.R. will be made to function as abortion clinics. The only difference being more tax payers being stuck with the bill.
I have to ask how emergency is being defined. I can’t imagine that any abortion ban does not permit abortion when the mother’s LIFE is truly in danger. So I have a feeling the definition for pro aborts has been expanded to included the mother’s health. Which as history has shown us includes just about any reason as long as her physician agrees. A little sad about your pregnancy presto we have major depression! A danger to health.
I don’t know if this is a popular opinion but I think it is a basic human right that you own your own labor. You can enter into an agreement (contractual or otherwise) to allow someone else to benefit from that labor but the key word is allow. You retain ownership (for lack of a better word) of it, which includes where you decide to engage it.
“Students and community activists — many of them Black — joined by the leadership of the teachers union, have called for the complete dismantling of the school police department. The presence of any officer on a campus, they say, “criminalizes” students, making them targets for potential harassment and undermining the role of school as a nurturing, academically focused environment.”
Well there ya go. The future Rhodes scholars do have a point.
I’m thinking if they have all this spare time classes at these universities sure as heck are not challenging enough. That goes for the tuition as well.
Why? The rule does not apply to propriety matters such as intellectual property which are rightly protected from theft. It simply means for example if you worked as a bookkeeper at Dowee,Cheatham,& Howe they can’t make you agree that you will never start your own bookkeeping business or work for another firm in that capacity.
You did not read the article. People complained because the priest realized having the author there was wrong and HE APOLOGIZED. That is what got him in trouble. That is why the bishop ousted him. Because he dared to say that guest speakers, authors, and the like do not belong in a Catholic school if their lifestyle is contrary to Catholic teaching.
AND ENOUGH WITH THIS SHIT THAT ALL PRIESTS ARE PEDOPHILES.
How is soliciting defined in the proposed bill? If it means that a 16 or 17 year old can’t consent to sex even with an adult close in age I would agree with the change. If it means enticing, forcing, or otherwise getting that teen to engage in sexual acts those ages should be left in.