[RobertFrost]

I think that linked article from the Seattle Times is just an attempt to save-face for the scientists... this has obviously gotten too mixed up to make sense of.

Which makes it glaringly apparent that environmental scientists and organizations will never be known for following credible science. With messes & scandals like this one, it is obvious that you can never trust anything they say.

[editor-surveyor]

"just an attempt to save-face for the scientists..."

Sorry, but they're not scientists, they're liars.

[expose]

Environmental scientists will do anythings for there Agenda

[zip]

I think that linked article from the Seattle Times is just an attempt to save-face for the scientists... this has obviously gotten too mixed up to make sense of.

Which makes it glaringly apparent that environmental scientists and organizations will never be known for following credible science. With messes & scandals like this one, it is obvious that you can never trust anything they say.

42 posted on 12/31/01 9:03 PM Pacific by RobertFrost [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: RobertFrost "just an attempt to save-face for the scientists..." Sorry, but they're not scientists, they're liars. 43 posted on 12/31/01 9:06 PM Pacific by editor-surveyor

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: expose Why are they not fired right now? 44 posted on 12/31/01 9:06 PM Pacific by MissAmericanPie

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: RobertFrost Environmental scientists will do anythings for there Agenda 45 posted on 12/31/01 9:07 PM Pacific by expose

These posts are worth repeating. They are exactly on target.

Thanks Robert Frost, expose, editor-surveyor, and MissAmericanPie