Posted on 10/06/2023 2:58:04 PM PDT by algore
At the forefront of environmental discussions at Michigan State University, Tom Sharkey, a University Distinguished Professor at the Plant Resilience Institute, posed a provocative question:
"Should we cut down all the oak trees?"
While he wasn't advocating for a literal deforestation of oaks, this theoretical question emerges from his team's recent discoveries about the role of trees, especially oaks and poplars, in air pollution dynamics.
Sharkey's research delves into the intricacies of isoprene -- a compound released by certain plants, particularly oaks and poplars.
This research reveals a paradox. On one hand, with global temperatures rising, these trees emit more isoprene which, when interacting with pollutants like nitrogen oxide, exacerbates poor air quality by contributing to particulate matter and low-atmosphere ozone.
On the other hand, isoprene bolsters the plants' resistance against environmental stressors such as insect attacks and high temperatures.
This double-edged sword leads Sharkey to ask, "Do we want plants to make more isoprene so they're more resilient, or do we want them making less so it's not making air pollution worse? What's the right balance?"
Despite isoprene being the second-largest emitted hydrocarbon on Earth -- trailing only behind methane emissions from human activities -- its significant impact on the environment remains relatively unknown to the general public. Sharkey, who has studied isoprene since his doctoral days at Michigan State in the 1970s, sheds light on its importance and the challenges it presents. Interestingly, this isn't the first time trees have been implicated in air pollution discussions. In the 1980s, then-president Ronald Reagan controversially claimed that trees produced more air pollution than cars. This statement, although exaggerated, contained a nugget of truth regarding the role of isoprene.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Tx for the link.
#27 On Thursday in Minneapolis, Minnesota according to my weather forecast from my cell phone there was to be a 74% chance of rain. When I checked on Friday the chance had changed to 1%.....
They just look out the window like the rest of us and guess!
Ping.
With the volume of incessant, existential threats being promoted — many, if not most of which disguise a significant political component — it’s a wonder how so many irrationally frightened, scientifically illiterate and breatakingly naive Americans live past the age of 25.
This chap noumenon has the right idea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.