Not detail, oriented?
He was an attorney designated by his mother has representing him in that particlar matter. Not just any attorney, but the former Editor of the Harvard Law Review.
When debating McCain in 2008 and repeatedly, he claimed the insurance company was denying payment FOR TREATMENT.
She acquired her disability policy AFTER she saw a doctor who surmised that she may have uterine cancer. The policy provided that if treated for a condition during that period, there would be no disability coverage FOR LOST INCOME. So, guess what a coverage dispute arose.
For Obama to have misrepresented as he clearly did the circumstances of an insurance dispute involving his own mother’s death but not involving the coverage issues in Obamacare, is more than adequate distortion and conscious misleading that under other factual circumstances would be grounds for a criminal fraud conviction.
Why should voters give him a pass and repress the logical conclusion that he is an habitual liar, e.g. 80% of Americans support his deficit limit tax raising plans?
Sorry, I hadn’t seen your comment before I wrote mine. You gave even more detail. Thanks.
He’s a liar.