Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/30/2005 7:28:54 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mia T
the inability to stop terrorist attacks in cities such as London

Dick, since when is Bush responsible for the security of the British Islands?

2 posted on 09/30/2005 7:34:32 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked (Never forget 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Or will someone from the movement itself -- a Sheehan -- come forth

Dear Lord, Dick, don't give cindy any ideas. If she sees that remark she might get the idea that she is "famous" enough to actually be president.

3 posted on 09/30/2005 7:37:07 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Dick, (gee the name seems so fitting). The 41 % of the President wouldn't have anything to do with the vicious attacks 24/7 by the leftists, including Hillary would they? The Katrina crisis was NOT President Bush's fault in any way, shape, or form, and the deaths in Iraq are because we are at war. (get the concept?) All of these things are contrived by the left to destroy a popular President. They have the advantage of an evil and biased media to carry their lying messages to the public. (who are so dumbed down it is laughable if not so pathetic.)


4 posted on 09/30/2005 7:42:59 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Wishful thinking on the part of Morris. Hillary is a shoe-in.


6 posted on 09/30/2005 7:47:16 PM PDT by WriteOn (Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

when "nipping at heels", just look up for whats coming down your way ...


7 posted on 09/30/2005 7:50:57 PM PDT by Zrob (freedom without lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

I made the mistake of clicking on Bubba's middle finger in that pic. I watched that video and now I am going to have nightmares tonight.


8 posted on 09/30/2005 7:55:49 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Dean? Gore? Biden? The Democrats might as well nominate Cindy Sheehan--or Minnie Mouse.


9 posted on 09/30/2005 7:56:17 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Love is the ultimate aphrodisiac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

I think Mark Warner is the man to beat.


10 posted on 09/30/2005 7:57:39 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("My Gov'nor don't got the answer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Shrillery is not making a "move to the right." She's trying to make it LOOK LIKE she's moving to the right. She's still the same radical bomb-throwing left-winger she's been ever since before she went to Well-lez-ley.

John F. Frankenkerry fooled a lot of people during last year's election campaign by making it look like he was moving ever-so-slightly to the center. Remember his phony photo-ops with guns? Shrillery's mission is to fool even more people than Frankenkerry did.


11 posted on 09/30/2005 8:26:07 PM PDT by billnaz (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

"In any event, Hillary is caught in a dilemma. If she moves to the left, she risks running afoul of the stereotype that a woman cannot be an effective wartime leader. She moves away from a Thatcher-esque image, which she will need to win the 2008 election. But if she leaves the left vacant, someone else will occupy the turf she has vacated and will give her fits in 2008, if not in her renomination run in 2006."


There is no more chance of the part of the political spectrum to the left of Hillary being effectively occupied by someone else than there was of someone occupying the position to the left of Stalin. And for similar reasons.

The "fishyness" in the Democrat party at this time is way past the ordinary level of control by party insiders in America. The Democrat party has become part of the Left, hence, not really democratic anymore. Hillary is running it, in my opinion, via processes that are not visible to the public.

Not to say that she doesn't still have to deal with the voters to some extent in the Democratic primaries. But I beleive the MSM will virtually do her bidding, which makes her failure in the Democratic nomination unlikely. The only thing that could stop her, in my opinion, would be massive revelations of the malfeasance of the Clinton administration. Since the MSM won't do it, the only people who could do it would be the President, Senators, and Congreesmen. But is seems they don't want to.


12 posted on 09/30/2005 8:45:54 PM PDT by strategofr (What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Trying to picture the Iowa caucuses in 2008 and Hillary having a snowball's chance. All I can see is Dean with that swallowed-a-bug look on his face, trying to explain what went wrong.
And she doesn't have Dean's charisma. ;)


13 posted on 09/30/2005 10:01:29 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Must be getting close to election time, Dick is now moving in the direction of the left.


15 posted on 09/30/2005 10:35:58 PM PDT by Dustbunny (America is to great for small dreams --- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

HILLARY METER.... NEGATIVES RISING

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2005/Hillary%20Meter.htm

The Hillary Meter is a twice monthly measure of Senator Hillary Clinton's effort to move to the political center. The next update is scheduled for Wednesday, October 5. For as long as the former First Lady is a viable candidate for the White House, Rasmussen Reports will monitor public perceptions of her political ideology.

The latest Rasmussen Reports Hillary Meter poll finds that 38% will definitely vote against her.

Clinton's gains come as she is seen moving closer to the political center. Forty-two percent (42%) now say that Clinton is politically liberal. That matches the lowest liberal rating ever recorded by the Hillary Meter (review trends). In January, 51% viewed Clinton as politically liberal.

Thirty-three percent (33%) now view her as politically moderate while 9% say she is a conservative.

Collectively, today’s Hillary Meter places Senator Clinton a net 50 points to the left of the nation's political center. Two weeks ago, she was 57 points to the left of center.


16 posted on 09/30/2005 11:31:57 PM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY and her HINO want to take over your country. STOP THEM NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

I've tried. I really have, but I just can't take Little Dick Morris seriously. If he was around at the time he would have bet the Japanese in WW II.


18 posted on 10/01/2005 4:38:52 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (The quisling ratmedia: always eager to remind us of why we hate them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T; All
From what I'm seeing on the left, Feingold may shape up to be the 'McCarthy' of the Dem party.

The MoveOn.org/Daily Kos-types aren't rabid at all for 'ol piano-legs and they are now the majority of the party in numbers... and in gelt. They wanted Dean, but were 'persuaded'(by the Dean-Scream) to back stiff'n'stodgy Kerry. They will NOT be so pliable the next go-round.

The more Hillary's forced to appeal to the kooks(the new base)... the more she offends the majority of voters.

Her only chance of winning is much like her rapist partners way... A THREE-WAY RACE.

19 posted on 10/01/2005 4:50:02 AM PDT by johnny7 (“I'm American, honey. Our names don't mean sh_t.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson