Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian scientist predicts global cooling
United Press International ^ | 8/25/2006 | UPI

Posted on 08/26/2006 12:18:52 AM PDT by carlo3b

NewsTrack - Science
Russian scientist predicts global cooling

MOSCOW, Aug. 25 (UPI) -- A Russian scientist predicts a period of global cooling in coming decades, followed by a warmer interval.

Khabibullo Abdusamatov expects a repeat of the period known as the Little Ice Age. During the 16th century, the Baltic Sea froze so hard that hotels were built on the ice for people crossing the sea in coaches.

The Little Ice Age is believed to have contributed to the end of the Norse colony in Greenland, which was founded during an interval of much warmer weather.

Abdusamatov and his colleagues at the Russian Academy of Sciences astronomical observatory said the prediction is based on measurement of solar emissions, Novosti reported. They expect the cooling to begin within a few years and to reach its peak between 2055 and 2060.

"The Kyoto initiatives to save the planet from the greenhouse effect should be put off until better times," he said. "The global temperature maximum has been reached on Earth, and Earth's global temperature will decline to a climatic minimum even without the Kyoto protocol."



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: closefridgedoor; globalidiots; globalwarming; gore; liberal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
Go figger.. Now where are the leftwingnuts going to go, their commie leaders are nixing their scam..? :)
1 posted on 08/26/2006 12:18:53 AM PDT by carlo3b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

probably won't get any press but I like cool weather.
Say, where are all of those devastating hurricanes that
were predicted?


2 posted on 08/26/2006 12:22:36 AM PDT by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

Reducing CO2 is surely something good. The problem is that Kyoto suggests a wrong path.


3 posted on 08/26/2006 12:27:17 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977

"Reducing CO2 is surely something good."

Increasing CO2 is good for plants. Plants are what we eat.
Don't you like plants?


4 posted on 08/26/2006 12:33:15 AM PDT by the final gentleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Also here

(...) Khabibullo Abdusamatov also explained the structure of solar activity cycles that last for 11 and 100 years. The scientist said that 11-year cycles do not affect the Earth's climate. Eighty-year cycles do not have much influence either, although 200-year cycles are much more powerful. The theory, the scientist told Pravda.Ru, was not considered a common scientific theory in the world. “The whole world has recognized the global warming theory, which pictures catastrophic situations in the future. I do not march in step with the world at this point. However, my theory has raised a certain interest in other countries. Hardly had I made a statement to RIA Novosti when I received several messages from scientists living in the USA, Iceland and other countries. They wanted to know more of my theory. They also want to know if I have delivered a detailed report on the matter and where it was published,” the scientist said."


5 posted on 08/26/2006 12:37:47 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the final gentleman

I went in China some month ago, and in many big cities pollution, due to CO2 (and other chemical substances), is really unbearable.


6 posted on 08/26/2006 12:39:40 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark; carlo3b
Nice thing about the Little Ice Age was that it led to the Golden Age of Beer.

Grapes for wine could no longer be cultivated in Northern Europe and thus Brewing Beer became prevalent.

Adversity breeds invention.

7 posted on 08/26/2006 12:40:31 AM PDT by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977
They also want to know if I have delivered a detailed report on the matter and where it was published,” the scientist said."

They want to tear him a new one.

8 posted on 08/26/2006 12:42:57 AM PDT by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977
Reducing CO2 is surely something good.

I have often wondered if socking away carbon in oil and coal deposits is what is responsible for the demise of Mega-Fauna (dinosaurs, giant sloths, stc, etc). Maybe the bio-available carbon got below some critical threshold where they could not survive. Maybe our digging that stuff up and releasing the carbon back to the biosphere will result in a new explosion of life on this planet. What the hey, it makes sense to me.

9 posted on 08/26/2006 12:45:45 AM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac; Chicago

I didn't remember that. I was told that many years ago by a beer-mister who worked for Ambrosia Brewing Company.. For you Chicagoans, do you remember Nectar Beer?? Mayor Richard J. Daley's favorite watering hole.. :)


10 posted on 08/26/2006 12:46:25 AM PDT by carlo3b ("Leave the gun, take the cannoli")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

11 posted on 08/26/2006 12:46:50 AM PDT by Dallas59 (ISLAMOFASCISM!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977

I doubt you were able to notice a difference between the co2 level in China and the the level in your own home. The difference is incredibly small only about 200 parts per million.

The fine particle pollution on the other hand is very noticable. It is important to not confuse one with the other.


12 posted on 08/26/2006 12:54:48 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

Classic Russian reversal. ha!


13 posted on 08/26/2006 12:56:35 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

In Shanghai, you can see easily the milky haze over the city, the smog is so thick that you may mistake the smog for an overcast day.


14 posted on 08/26/2006 12:58:47 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

algorejr will never permit this, will he?


15 posted on 08/26/2006 1:11:30 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

Your joking right?

This guy said three years. The election is in two. If a Dem is elected and the following year the temperature is cooler - "See! Aren't you glad you elected us to get rid of global warming?!"

And if they lose, it will be because they brought it up as an election issue and force the Republicans to deal with it.

Anyway - I don't believe this Russkie - measuring the SUN to figure out EARTH'S temperature! Bah!


16 posted on 08/26/2006 1:19:46 AM PDT by geopyg (If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

It must be a slow "climate catastrophe/sky is falling" news day. This story goes back to February.


17 posted on 08/26/2006 1:51:10 AM PDT by Outland (Socialism IS the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark
Say, where are all of those devastating hurricanes that were predicted?

Ernesto will be visiting the gulf coast next week.

18 posted on 08/26/2006 1:51:30 AM PDT by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977

I'm sure that is so but co2 sure isn't the cause.


19 posted on 08/26/2006 1:57:50 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

Newsweek was on to this in 1975, long before they were on to Global Warming:

"There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production– with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now. The regions destined to feel its impact are the great wheat-producing lands of Canada and the U.S.S.R. in the North, along with a number of marginally self-sufficient tropical areas – parts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indochina and Indonesia – where the growing season is dependent upon the rains brought by the monsoon."

http://denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm


20 posted on 08/26/2006 1:58:15 AM PDT by YCTHouston (Goodbye Flyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson