[Mia T]

There were two historians that were on Face the Nation...Goodwin and that other guy they usually have. When the subject turned to Clinton, they both almost called him a buffoon. I wish the subject would have turned to Hillary.

posted on 1/24/02 8:14 AM Pacific by Angelique

Q ERTY5 bump!

The other guy" was probably Beshlow (ph).

 

Ever since 9/11, Goodwin & Beshlow-- (sounds like a comedy team, doesn't it?)--have been making the rounds, covering their collective historiographer-posterior regarding their pre-9/11 propping up of the inept, corrupt, or to quote Goodwin, "admittedly unfit," clintons.

 

 

The Forbids 400's argument is shamelessly spurious.

They get all unhinged over the impeachment of clinton,

claiming that it will

"leave the presidency permanently disfigured and diminished,

at the mercy as never before of the caprices of any Congress."

 

Yet they dismiss the real and present--and future!!--danger

to the presidency and the country

of not impeaching and removing

this admittedly unfit, (Goodwin)

"documentably dysfunctional," (NYT)

presidency-diminishing, (Goodwin)

power-abusing,

psychopathic thug.

 

Doris Kearns Goodwin and those 400 other

hog-and-bow-tied-save-clinton,

retrograde-obsessing historiographers

are a supercilious, power-hungry,

egomaniacal lot in their own right.

 

For them, clinton validates

what Ogden Nash merely hypothesized:

Any buffoon can make history,

but only a great man can write it.

Mia T,  History Lesson

[Angelique]

I love it. Yes, that is the guy, and they do seem like a comedy team. However, THAT day, the "historians" were NOT that pair. Those two would NEVER criticize Clinton.

Of course, do not forget THE historian of our time:

Who ARE these people??
-Al Gore asking who the busts of our Founding Fathers are at Monticello before the Inauguration.