Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Doesn't Remember Abramoff Meetings
AssPress via Yahoo!News ^ | January 22, 2006

Posted on 01/22/2006 2:36:34 PM PST by Kaslin

WASHINGTON - Although President Bush says he doesn't recall meeting convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff, the two have reportedly turned up in photos together.

Both Washingtonian and Time magazines have reported the existence of about a half-dozen photos showing the two together.

Time reported on its Web site Sunday that its staff members have seen at least six photos featuring Bush and Abramoff, who has pleaded guilty to federal charges stemming from his lobbying practices and has pledged to cooperate with investigators. They appeared to have been taken at White House functions, according to the reports.

The White House has acknowledged that Abramoff attended some events at the Executive Mansion, and spokeswoman Dana Perino said Sunday it's not surprising that the two would have met.

"The president has taken tens upon thousands of pictures at such events," Perino said.

Abramoff met a few times with White House staff and attended Hanukkah receptions in 2001 and 2002, the White House has said, but officials there have refused to disclose how many times he's been into the complex or what business he had there.

The White House also has not released any photos featuring the president and Abramoff, who was declared a Bush "pioneer" for raising at least $100,000 for the Bush-Cheney '04 re-election campaign.

Contributions that came directly from Abramoff, his wife and one of the American Indian tribes he represented — a total of $6,000 — were donated to the American Heart Association by the campaign just days after Abramoff entered his guilty pleas.

The White House, after playing down the Bush-Abramoff photos and the lobbyist's ties to the president, criticized Abramoff for breaking the law. "Mr. Abramoff admitted being involved in outrageous wrongdoing," Perino said.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: abramoff; abramoffwho; bush43
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: FairOpinion

I'm just so glad that Time, Newsweek, etc. went after Clinton as ferociously and obviously as they do with President Bush. Right!!!

What a joke these magazines and the rest of the MSM is! I'm just really tired of this endless assault on W and how they are trying to find anything that they can on him even if it is destructive to our National Security like in the case with the NSA deal.

There was so many obvious illegal doings in the Clinton administration and minus Rush there was NOBODY talking about it.


61 posted on 01/22/2006 4:56:33 PM PST by kcrackel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kcrackel

Guys, I don't like Clinton either, but he's gone now !! We know the liberal media is against Bush, but the president has to make sure he doesn't give them any more ammo !! I hope Bush is telling the truth about Abramoff, that's all. Otherwise, it's going to be bad news.


62 posted on 01/22/2006 5:00:34 PM PST by WillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: WillT

****if he was photographed several times with him I think the odds favor that he did know Abramoff. But let's see all the facts first.****


I haven't read this whole story, but the story on CNN webpage said that Abramoff is pictured with several of his sons in different pictures. When you take your kids to see Santa Claus you don't throw him them all in his lap and take one picture. It was probably a dad's day out thing and each of his sons got to have a personal momento of meeting the President.

Also, if I was a lobbyist, I would try to get as many photos of myself with the present administration to hang on my wall and impress the people I was smoozing.

It bothers me that the media says, 'We've seen the photos, but we won't post them. Just trust us to interpret them.' Yeah, right. Probably if we saw the photos we would realize they were all just 'shake the President's hand and snap a picture' pictures.


63 posted on 01/22/2006 5:09:32 PM PST by Elyse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bttt


64 posted on 01/22/2006 5:11:12 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bill Clinton was seen at several major events with this woman ....It is rumored she knew Craig Livingstone

65 posted on 01/22/2006 5:13:35 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elyse

You read the CNN website? Has it improved? lol


66 posted on 01/22/2006 5:26:51 PM PST by WillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: WillT

***You read the CNN website? Has it improved? lol***

NO!

LOL


67 posted on 01/22/2006 5:44:02 PM PST by Elyse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

the horror....


68 posted on 01/22/2006 6:16:28 PM PST by wardaddy (Alito is Clapton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bump


69 posted on 01/22/2006 6:27:31 PM PST by RippleFire ("It's a joke, son!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

70 posted on 01/22/2006 6:27:38 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin

As I recall, Bill and Hillary Clinton were seen posing with dozens of convicted felons, with Clinton even pardoning many of them on his last day in office.

Then there were all those dead bodies of friends who committed suicide, etc. in Arkansas. What are the odds of so many "friends" committing suicide, dying in plane crashes, or just mysteriously dying anyway?


72 posted on 01/22/2006 7:27:56 PM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

What are the odds of so many "friends" committing suicide, dying in plane crashes, or just mysteriously dying anyway?

The odds are incredibly high that IF you are a "friend" of the Clintons AND you cause trouble THEN you are going to die SOON!


73 posted on 01/22/2006 7:50:28 PM PST by BILL_C (Those who don't understand the lessons of Histcory are bound to repeat them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Gacey!


74 posted on 01/22/2006 9:18:59 PM PST by Atchafalaya (When you're there, that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

all spying charges were dropped against wen ho lee and I don't think he ever met clinton

there was a chinese general who met with clinton, a AK restauranteur charlie trie, and commerce person john huang who are implicated in campaign finance "irregularities".


75 posted on 01/22/2006 9:27:53 PM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT CONSERVATIVES are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WillT

You can wander back to Democrats Unglued now. No one will fall for your hysteria here.


76 posted on 01/23/2006 3:10:37 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"Both Washingtonian and Time magazines have reported the existence of about a half-dozen photos showing the two together."

Is this going to be another spin like the NYT's fake bomb picture?


77 posted on 01/23/2006 3:13:11 AM PST by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WillT
All these phony angst at Bush. Perhaps you can explain to me why it is the Bush DOJ that is busting this wide open by prosecuting Abramoff?

Perhaps you can explain why 2 of the 5 target in the 1st level DOJ investigation into Abramoff's ties to lawmakers are Harry Reid (D-NV) and Byron Dorgan (D-NV)?

But it is not about the facts now is it? Just another excuse for the usual collection of whiners to rant at Bush.

78 posted on 01/23/2006 3:15:03 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Had he already begun to do his nasties when the photo was shot?


79 posted on 01/23/2006 3:17:43 AM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone

I don't know...that's a good question...and that's always a good question in these kinds of matters.


80 posted on 01/23/2006 4:02:58 AM PST by stylin19a (God does not apply to your alloted time, the hours spent playing golf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson