Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1990s-Size Returns Are Gone
The Orange County Register ^ | November 22, 2001 | James B. Kelleher

Posted on 11/25/2001 12:11:13 PM PST by Arleigh

Edited on 04/14/2004 10:04:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The PIMCO bond whiz sees a decade ahead with stock-market gains of about 5 percent.

Count the blessings you enjoyed in the stock market during the 1990s. The days of double-digit percentage gains are over and gone.

During the next decade, he says, stock investors can expect returns of 5 percent. And everyone is going to have to save more and spend less.


(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Baby Boomers are going to be so furious when they realize that they ALL can't retire to a Tuscan villa when they turn 62! I read one estimate that if people cut spending enough to properly save for retirement, unemployment would be at 7.8%

Real Estate Bubble is the last mania maintaining Boomers in denial of the ugly fact that they don't have enough money to retire upon. When that pops, expect Congressional hearings to determine how Wall Street insiders were able to steal trillions from suckers, er, small investors. And expect huge Gubmint handouts to the poor SUV-driving, restaurant-dining Boomers in the decades ahead. >>Sigh!<<

1 posted on 11/25/2001 12:11:13 PM PST by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
I read one estimate that if people cut spending enough to properly save for retirement, unemployment would be at 7.8%.

And I guess you think this is a Bad thing?

My port is up quite nicely this year, thank you. I reckon there will always be money to be made in the market. I work hard to figure out where that will be. Sometimes I'm wrong. But I'm right often enough to pay the bills. Gloom and doom my ass!

2 posted on 11/25/2001 12:22:03 PM PST by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
Money would likely flow to foreign markets if the US marktes have sub-par returns. Nevertheless, earning twice the rate of inflation is not that bad.

I doubt anybody can really predict the market 10 years out. Did anybody in 1980 predict the market returns from 1980-1990? Did anybody in 1990 predict the market returns from 1990-2000? Nobody really knows what the next 10 years has in store for us.

3 posted on 11/25/2001 12:22:47 PM PST by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
BS, this is fodder for the pessimist bears, I recovered all my losses in 2 months I know some aren't as fortunate, that is how the ball bounces.
4 posted on 11/25/2001 12:23:05 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I reckon there will always be money to be made in the market. I work hard to figure out where that will be.

You do realize you are part of a tiny minority, don't you? Most "investors" today simply throw their money at rumors, tips and mutual funds that had a good last quarter. Most "investors" can't read a balance sheet or even tell you the per-share earnings of anything in their portfolio.

5 posted on 11/25/2001 12:26:40 PM PST by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
Another stock market guru who can forecast the markets.

Run fast, very fast, in the opposite direction of anyone who claims to have an inkling of what stocks and bonds will do past one month. Anything can happen, and usually does. This economy is like a religion: no one knows for sure and all the scripture that exists can make the future any clearer.

6 posted on 11/25/2001 12:29:22 PM PST by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
Nevertheless, earning twice the rate of inflation is not that bad.

Unless, of course, your "retirement plan" counts on 11% annual returns for the next 25 years! The problem is that most Boomers are spending 105% of their disposable income on luxury items and counting on stocks and real estate gains to do their saving for them. Ain't gonna happen. And when they finally figure this out, then you'll hear the whining.

7 posted on 11/25/2001 12:29:50 PM PST by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
Run fast, very fast, in the opposite direction of anyone who claims to have an inkling of what stocks and bonds will do past one month.

You have it EXACTLY backwards!

Nobody can predict what stocks will do over a time period as short as a month. Over the long haul, however, you can predict what stocks will do pretty safely - grow about fast as earnings.

Stock prices outstripped economy during the 1990s. They are roughly 10 years ahead of the economy. Therefore, we can either expect a steep drop right away, followed by resumed 3-5% growth - or sideways motion for a decade.

8 posted on 11/25/2001 12:34:39 PM PST by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
BS, this is fodder for the pessimist bears...

Not pessimism. Realism.

Don't you realize that you are being LIED to by all the Big-Money elites? Do you really believe every Wall Street shill who has identified at least a dozen "bottoms" since April 2000? Do you really believe the economy will recover in the first half, er, second half of 2001, er, the first half of 2002?

Doesn't it worry you when the Chairman of the Federal Reserve thinks it's a GOOD thing that Americans are busy taking equity out of their houses (equity that really isn't there, BTW) to buy needless luxury items? When the economy is so fragile the PRESIDENT has to make TV commercials BEGGING Americans to spend money on needless vacations?

9 posted on 11/25/2001 12:42:10 PM PST by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
BS...you watch...everyone in the "business" is saying this...which means double-digit returns will come back, but it may be in other industries than before...we shall see. Read the book, "The Roaring 2000's".
10 posted on 11/25/2001 12:42:55 PM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
It was all an illusion to keep Clinton in power through 80% of the 90s. The height of the stock bubble began during his 1996 reelection run, and was kept going to ridiculous heights during his impeachment and other scandal woes. The plug was pulled in Billy's last year--2000--as it was decided Clinton would not be staying in office. His bosses even had enough of him.
11 posted on 11/25/2001 12:46:06 PM PST by roughrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
Get out of debt and stay out, I bonds, smart realestate buys after the bubble pops, and don't quit your day job!

BigMack

12 posted on 11/25/2001 12:47:17 PM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith
Read the book, "The Roaring 2000's".

We all know what came after the Roaring 20's - the Great Depression! :-)

As an antidote to the Big Money brainwashing, try reading Shiller's "Irrational Exuberance." Or, better yet, try studying a little Economics 101 and a little financial history on your own, instead of reading what the people who make their money selling stocks tell you to read..

13 posted on 11/25/2001 12:48:40 PM PST by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Get out of debt and stay out, I bonds, smart realestate buys after the bubble pops, and don't quit your day job!

I'd add a teensy bit of gold (coins and stocks), but otherwise I agree with you.

14 posted on 11/25/2001 12:50:18 PM PST by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: roughrider
It was all an illusion to keep Clinton in power through 80% of the 90s.

I agree with you 110%. The tool Clinton used was Fannie Mae/Freddi Mac and other Government Sponsored Enterprises to pump cash into the consumer economy. When THEY start going down the drain, there'll be hell to pay. Expect a government bailout that will make S&L bailout look like pocket change.

The reason you don't hear this more often is that the Demopublican and Republicrat elites BOTH benefit from today's over-heated economy.

15 posted on 11/25/2001 12:54:14 PM PST by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
You are right on about the spend it now crowd. These home equity loans are a disaster much larger than the S&l bail out.Two locals here in Eureka purchased two thrifts (1 in Texas & 1 in Alaska) and made millions collecting the "bad loans". I still believe the S&L thing was brought on by the tax law that changed the deprecation on property.
16 posted on 11/25/2001 1:26:26 PM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
Pessimism has never been a strong suite. I can assure you, today, that the markets will rise greater than 5% average over the next 10 years.

I can also predict that inventions and technologies will cause this to occur.

Just as my gratuitous assertion can be scoffed at, so can the writers assertion be decried as unwarranted pessimism.

17 posted on 11/25/2001 1:36:52 PM PST by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
Gross has a fine record with his PIMCO bond funds, but he's been calling for 5 to 6% stock returns since '96 or '97, when he wrote the book Everything You Know About Investing Is Wrong
18 posted on 11/25/2001 3:31:34 PM PST by Deckard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
Absolutely correct home equity loans propped up consumer spending amongst what might be called middle class way beyond what any normal economic cycle might allow. Housing in my area, (suburban Chicago) skyrocketed allowing people to borrow cheaply and became what most people think is free money, "hey I'm wealthy see my house added $30,000 of equity last year." Of course now many of these people owe more on their houses than what they market will pay and it is beginning albeit slowly into their psyche. If the FED can still monetize the agency debt we will be OK, but if not this guy's predictions are overly optimistic.
19 posted on 11/25/2001 3:42:04 PM PST by junta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
I read one estimate that if people cut spending enough to properly save for retirement, unemployment would be at 7.8%

There was a time not long ago when 7% unemplyment was considered fully employed......

20 posted on 11/25/2001 4:47:07 PM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson