Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Looked like an interesting article and I couldn't find it on FR search.
1 posted on 06/07/2009 7:50:26 PM PDT by Kevmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sidebar Moderator; Admin Moderator

Mods:

The title is supposed to be: The Suppression of Inconvenient Facts in Physics

The HTML infected text does not show up on preview. Can you please change the title?


2 posted on 06/07/2009 7:51:55 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop; neverdem; ShadowAce; SunkenCiv

Pinging my favorite technofreepers; I thought you might like this article.


3 posted on 06/07/2009 7:55:39 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Ya know I was thinking about Ronald Hatch’s Modified Lorentz Aether Theory just the other day while I was eating my fritos.


4 posted on 06/07/2009 7:56:10 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Increasingly mulling Newt....or maybe not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

We see the attempted suppression of physics (by supposed engineers) on tech threads all the time here at Free Republic.

The speed at which a vehicle attains maximum fuel efficiency is a determined by a formula referencing it’s mass, gearing, and drag coefficient.

But you will find quite a lot of people here at FR who were taught some goofy shortcut in college that tries to show that speed to be relatively constant at around 55 MPH.

This is not even on the same constant as truth, and anyone who owned one of those heavy muscled family cars in the 60’s and 70’s will tell them so - but it is like talking to a wall.

So sadly this has spread beyond the social liberals.


6 posted on 06/07/2009 7:59:05 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Fringekookaphobia. When will it end?


9 posted on 06/07/2009 8:06:52 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

And Maxwell had a lot more than just four equations, too.


12 posted on 06/07/2009 8:08:32 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks Kevmo. :')

· String Theory Ping List ·
Sorry we re open
· View or Post in 'blog · Join · Bookmark · List topics · · post a topic · FR page layout · Google ·

15 posted on 06/07/2009 8:18:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

I liked it.


16 posted on 06/07/2009 8:25:25 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Pretending the Admin Moderator doesn't exist will result in suspension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

The

RELIGION OF SCIENTISM

is one of the most hideous, irrational, narrow, rigid, haughty, brittle, tyrannical, ruthless, punitive . . .

religions on the face of the planet.

It has been so for many decades, at least.

In some respects, Galileo had it easy, by comparison.

. . . except for the deadlier aspects of his situation. LOL.


18 posted on 06/07/2009 8:28:44 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

I’ve considered cold fusion as hogwash from the start. I still do. If somebody wants to try and make it work nobody is stopping them from wasting their time and money. If they did actually make it work they could get very rich, very fast. They could laugh all the way to the bank ( although with ZERO in charge I’d put the discovery to work in some other country) .


26 posted on 06/07/2009 9:24:01 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals aren't screaming you're doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo; SunkenCiv

This is Bravo Sierra, but who has the time to refute it? I can assure you that if someone has a better description of something than the present “truth” then the new description will be the next “truth” and so forth. In Science we only have temporary “truth” and are always trying to improve it.

Naturally, some descriptions (such as classical mechanic) are very good and thus a good description of the “truth” while other are bad (What is the heaviest possible stable atom, check my web site “Island of instability”).


38 posted on 06/07/2009 11:23:49 PM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AndrewC; antonia; aristotleman; Carilisa; commonguymd; dozer7; Dustbunny; Eaker; ForGod'sSake; ...
The challenges to orthodoxy that are swept under the rug by modern science... PING!

If you want on or off the Electric Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.

40 posted on 06/07/2009 11:30:57 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

I call this the ‘yuppifaction of science’. Yuppies ruining science in other words.


48 posted on 06/08/2009 4:41:28 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Ain’t peer review great?


53 posted on 06/08/2009 4:51:11 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Clearly the writer of this piece has an interest in what is often termed ‘free energy’ but if one strips all this away what remains is the essential brotherhood of the established scientific priesthood; what gets published gets read and only that.


66 posted on 06/08/2009 10:22:35 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo
While there may be some kind of truth to this post, as someone who has worked with and personally known many science types, there is far too much competition within science for there to be any real suppression. Sure the Majority may look askance at you for your heretical views, but the potential rewards for the person who is proven right are simply far too great. Nobel prize, scientific immortality, you can imagine.

Most people probably don't understand how competitive being a Scientist is, it can actually be pretty cut throat. In fact, many say that it is TOO competitive, leading to a hoarding of data, information, and resources.

So while there are things like funding that can be scarce for the guy who goes against the grain, the Maverick can come into SUBSTANTIAL reward for being right.

75 posted on 06/09/2009 6:43:08 AM PDT by Paradox (When the left have no one to villainize, they'll turn on each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo
In a paper titled A Solid-State Maxwell Demon (57) D.P. Sheehan and A.R. Putnam of the departments of Physics and J.H. Wright of the department of Mathematics and Computer science of the University of San Diego have proposed a semiconductor device that would generate useful energy from the thermal noise of an electronic circuit. The authors successfully tested their model on a commercial semiconductor simulator and estimate that the technology necessary to construct a laboratory model will be available by 2007.

It's now past 2007; any follow-up?

Cheers!

80 posted on 11/02/2009 9:59:35 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson