Chipping causes cancer in pets, so NOT FOR ME. Anyone wishes to try to insert that in me .. I will insert BUCKSHOT into them...
bookmark
Criminals should be microchipped, not law-abiding citizens.
What happened to the medic-alert bracelets? I am sure a chip could be on one of those, which are external, and NOT mandatory. My son’s godfather wore one, because he was diabetic.
What page is that on in the bill?
Hussein is already getting under my skin and I want him O U T!
fools
Microchipping people should cause a civil war.
but it won’t
Hold on here.
I know you just copied the Subject from that website but NOTHING in the video says anything about the healthcare bill or any provision that it will be mandatory or in 36 months.
Let’s just stick with the facts. There’s enough hype about RFID going around, and I see no problem if it is OPTIONAL at the patients request, which is what this video says.
You know what the space travel log said about that destination? ITs the mark and should be prevented unless you want end times sooner....
just think! a great way to give up Gods greatest gift to mankind... liberty, rights and freedoms.... and be replaced by the muslim freaks ideals.....
I watched the video. No mention of the Health Care bill. Do you have support for the bill requiring it or funding it?
how willing the sheeple in the media are.
OMG..it is a number...didn’t they give the Jews numbers?
The American people are considered to be nothing more than cattle by Pharaoh Obama and his communist Democrat Party Regime that is now ruling (ruining) our country.
Even mind numbed lefty’s wont support that.
This story does not illustrate your headline. This news report says nothing about a 36 month time period. And getting this chip seems to be completely voluntary. Obviously some people want this technology. Others will not.
But this news story you link to has no mention of a plan for general application in this story. All that is described in the piece is that they exist and how they work.
The piece of Obamacare that discusses these implantable devices says nothing at all about involuntary implementation or universal use. It is about creating a National Database that could use this sort of technology, as well as maintaining data on all sorts of other implantable medical devices (pumps, monitors, joint replacements, etc.).
Considering the problems with RFIDs - including subcutaneous reactions and data vulnerability - it is extremely doubtful that these devices will be demanded wholesale.
Of course, if it really worries you, write to your State Representative immediately. Have him or her pass state regulations prohibiting any nonvoluntary RFIDs, for any purpose. Wisconsin, North Dakota, and California have already passed such bills.
The concern I have is that anyone with a reader can read it, maybe even from a distance. So the privacy issues are huge. And, if you can read it, maybe you can tamper with it also and modify medical information.
Moreover, I thought the brave new world was to have all our medical records in a big Federal computer in the sky. If that happens, why do medical professionals need to know anything other than who we are. So a number tattooed to us should be sufficient. And that can't be scanned from a distance. (Only partially kidding).
Malarky. This is stating that there will a national database on implantable Class II devices which are pacemakers, insulin pumps, chemotherapy pumps, etc...
The Right News is taking two seperate items and jamming them together to mean something completely different.
Y’aint microchipping me! I’d rather kill myself than be microchipped.
Please put this in breaking.