Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 09/13/2010 10:54:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Summary: This is a long post, but the bottom line is worth the time to read it. Under oath, in front of the House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology, Lord Oxburgh testified that it is impossible to reconstruct an accurate global temperature record over the past 1,000 years. Especially one that could claim modern climate is significantly different from that seen over the last 1000 years.
Main Post: There was a stunning hearing last week in the UK’s House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, wherein one Lord Oxburgh testified about his investigation of the University of East Anglia’s (UEA) Climatic Research Unit (CRU). CRU is the organization at the heart of last fall’s email controversies dubbed Climategate, when it was discovered scientists had used ‘tricks’ to fool people into thinking there has been massive global warming during the industrial revolution and subsequent population explosion. CRU scientists were also caught working in concert with leading US researchers to squash contrary science findings, using their roles as peer reviewers of science journals. They rigged the scientific process and debate to support only their views while censoring sound science that would challenge (if not out right destroy) their views.
As the world’s scientists and engineers (like myself) who work in other, more rigorous fields of science, statistics and modeling began to focus our attention on the so called settled science of global warming, we discovered errors, problems in methodology, unpublished uncertainties, and numerous questions about the science behind the claims. Some took the lead in beginning to probe the science to see if it could stand up to scrutiny through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at strata-sphere.com ...
Ping.
I always knew it was a hoax.
U.S.A. hands out the big greenie grants.
yitbos
namvolunteer, ahead of the curve.
yitbos
Whatever happened to the FReeper AGW kooks?
I will not mention names, but we all know who they are/were.
No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)
That article takes Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.
The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'
It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming
Those four articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.
Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud
That article pretty much puts the kibosh on any serious trend of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign at all of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? Beyond the centuries long slow warming of the earth and rising of the seas of course. But that is only a few millimeters per century due to the inter-glacial period we are in.
The bastards behind this trillion dollar, freedom-threatening, world-splitting premeditated, sadistic scam: the bankers, "carbon" investors, politicians, and oh yeah, the so-called "scientists" - should all be hanged for attempting a massive crime against humanity, through the attempted derivative murder of billions of people.
Absolute, slithering, elitist scum.
Add to that the utter gross violation of the main foundation of real science : the inviolability and accessibility of the basic data, and the repeatability of the original data yielding identical results when performed by an entirely different group or individual.
That this was a scam from the start, in retrospect, should have been obvious.
btrl
Al Gore just got REEMED!
I think it’s time for a new word, ladies and gents. The word is “aGlobalWarmitheist” that is, a person who denies the beliefs of the Global Warming religion openly.
-What do you think?
The radical global warming belief has probably moved past money into a delusion. The believers have gone to the point of demanding Carbon indulgences... or buying a right to emit CO2. Does that sound familiar to anyone?
I love the use of the images of Mars from 1956 and 2001, nice comparison as to how the fuzzy facts of climate science can not prove what global temps were 150 years ago. Thanks for posting this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.