Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
The best indication that "Shakespeare" didn't write those plays is the name itself. As far back as Elizabethan times, a "spear shaker" was a third-echelon player, below even Supporting Cast: a human presence on the stage who had to be there just because someone had to be there.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto

17 posted on 06/07/2010 5:09:59 PM PDT by fporretto (This tagline is programming you in ways that will not be apparent for years. Forget! Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: fporretto

I think that’s probably an urban legend, but anyway, he didn’t even use that form of his name himself necessarily.


20 posted on 06/07/2010 5:22:24 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: fporretto
He had his father John Shakespeare take the name for the same reason, a man who was a glover?

If that is your best argument I find it unresearched and unpersuasive.

He was born and baptized with that name, long before he was ever involved in the theater.

31 posted on 06/07/2010 6:42:46 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson