Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
"I have a feeling Sam, Merry and Pippin have no particular commitment to the mission, but a deep commitment only to their friend. Frodo is safest with them. They have no personal ambition for evil to get a foothold in."

I'm sure that's right. Personal ambition for power is so rare in the Shire that they don't even need a government.

Still, the ring does have the capability to awaken desire for power in hobbits as is shown by Smeagol/Gollum and Frodo and Sam later.

565 posted on 05/10/2002 6:44:50 AM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Cree
Unfortunately yes, it can corrupt even our hobbits if they hold it long enough...

Since the ring pulls people and twists them based on their own personal power and ambition, its power very much depends on the stature of the bearer. Bilbo saw its purpose to be only to hide from people (like the Sackville Bagginses) he didn't want to see. Even when in the end it corrupted him, it was through simple lust for the thing. In the end he coveted the Ring itself, not the power over people he could have gained with it. Very similar to Gollum.

Frodo, we can't talk about yet...

567 posted on 05/10/2002 7:05:52 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson