Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Marrying cousins not so risky
CNN ^ | 4-17-02 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 05/30/2002 7:49:17 PM PDT by vannrox

Study: Marrying cousins not so risky / CNN Health




PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania (AP) -- The risk of birth defects in children born to couples who are first or second cousins isn't as high as many experts had believed, according to a study that sheds new light on a practice that is stigmatized in many Western cultures.




The study released Wednesday says married cousins are still more likely than unrelated couples to have children with a birth defect, significant mental retardation or serious genetic disease.




An unrelated couple has about a 3 percent to 4 percent risk of having a child with such problems. But for close cousins who are married, that risk jumps only 1.7 percent to 2.8 percent, the study said.




Researcher Robin Bennett said that is lower than many people, including family doctors, believed to be the case.




"The commonsense point of this is that there is a definite risk, but the risk is rather small," said one of the researchers, Dr. Arno G. Motulsky, professor of medicine and genome sciences at the University of Washington.




Marriage of first cousins is illegal in 30 states and is taboo in many Western cultures, but that is not the case in other places, particularly the Middle East, Asia and Africa. In some countries, up to 60 percent of the population is related by blood, and cousin marriages are preferred to unions of unrelated couples.




Bennett said doctors are confronted with new challenges about advising and treating related couples as more immigrants carry on such traditions in the United States.




"There have surely been lots of terminations of pregnancies because of misconceptions about the actual level of risk," she said.




Researchers stressed that it is impossible to calculate the risk with precision because so many factors are involved. Risks vary among ethnic groups, and the family history and closeness of the relation may also play a role, for example.




The researchers said couples should have a thorough medical family history taken before conception to see whether they have any similar recessive genes that could show up in a child as illness.




Relatives could both be carriers of the recessive gene that causes cystic fibrosis, for example, but not have any symptoms. A child who gets the recessive gene from both parents is more likely to get the disease.




"What surprised us is that you don't really need to be doing much more than you already are," Bennett said. "Many of these tests are routine now for everyone."




The analysis of six already published studies appears in the April issue of the Journal of Genetic Counseling. The six studies involved thousands of related couples.




The study's recommendations are the result of a two-year evaluation by genetic counselors, doctors and epidemiologists assembled by the National Society of Genetic Counselors, based in Wallingford, Pennsylvania.




Funding for the study came from the society and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.


TOPICS: Education; Health/Medicine; History; Miscellaneous; Science; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: child; cousin; defect; gene; kiss; marry; risk; science; study

1 posted on 05/30/2002 7:49:17 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox;Jimmyclyde;Cagey
JC.....why did I think of you immediately when I read this?! lol......Did you notice, it was written in Pennsylvania a NORTHERN State.... lol

Whohoo! Those 20 states where marrying a cousin is NOT illegal can now proudly shout of their "no branch on the family tree" love........lol

2 posted on 05/30/2002 9:01:04 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Some things are just WRONG...like two family members getting married.
3 posted on 05/30/2002 9:14:39 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

You know you're a redneck if…

Your family tree doesn't have branches.

4 posted on 05/30/2002 9:26:57 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
An unrelated couple has about a 3 percent to 4 percent risk of having a child with such problems. But for close cousins who are married, that risk jumps only 1.7 percent to 2.8 percent, the study said.

This represents at best, a 50% increase in risk and at worst a doubling of risk. Only someone whose parents were cousins would think such an increase in risk not significant.

5 posted on 05/30/2002 9:57:50 PM PDT by Pres Raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
So thats the reason you moved to Pennsylvania...LOL

I'm sure they got their test subjects from either a tractor pull or monster truck show down in Mississippi....

Oh...wait maybe it was at a swamp buggy race down in Florida.

6 posted on 05/31/2002 4:49:14 AM PDT by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Yes.....lol......that's why I moved to PA.....but don't spread it around, ok? lol

Behind those evil comments lies a lot of humor Yankee....it's showing through......lol (either that, or you're just beggin for a whoopin!)........

7 posted on 05/31/2002 5:11:24 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
A whoopin from a Texas girl...

Ummmm....

OKAY!!!!!

8 posted on 05/31/2002 5:15:13 AM PDT by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Great news for you and your family.
9 posted on 05/31/2002 5:32:03 AM PDT by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA;Jimmyclyde
When Cousins Marry
10 posted on 05/31/2002 11:23:27 AM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Shoot, my family knew this a long time ago!
11 posted on 05/31/2002 11:26:54 AM PDT by aomagrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey;Jimmyclyde
Cag - that is just evil.......lol
12 posted on 05/31/2002 12:10:11 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA,cagey
Cag, is that you and Texas at your prom....?

I'm sure you both won King and Queen...

Of the double wide that is.

For the love of all that is good... don't post that picture EVER again!!

13 posted on 05/31/2002 7:01:15 PM PDT by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde;Cagey
Yes, JC, that is Cag and I at our Prom - neither of us graduated, but we hit the age limit and had to leave anyway........ lol

We broke up because he was prettier than me ----- I couldn't handle that...........;^#

14 posted on 06/01/2002 8:13:01 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Well then the Clinton family line must be ok....

;-)

15 posted on 06/01/2002 8:13:51 AM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson