Three interesting things in this for me.
1) The DOJ arranged the FBI interview of Mills. She left the interview because the FBI interviewer asked questions that were out of bounds to what was agreed to beforehand. This should remove any doubt this is a criminal probe.
2) Mills is a lawyer and had a lawyer with her. It has been reported the Clintons are paying for her lawyers. I think it’s fair to conclude the Clinton’s don’t want her talking or making deal.
3) Breitbart reported that Mills left the room when asked about the process that was used to decide which emails to release to State and which to delete. When she returned, she asserted attorney client privilege. I don’t see any way these events could be covered by privilege. Mills was either working for the State Department and can be compelled to testify or she was Hillary’s attorney after she left her post and was assisting her client in destroying material stolen from the government.
Sure sounds like more than trading recipe cards and deciding what is and isn’t classified as Hillary has said. Sounds a lot like the FBI is tightening the noose on criminal charges.
If you recall she was sighted in the basement where the email shredding operation took place...
Hillary Clinton Bombshell: Whistle Blower Tells Investigators That State Department Shredded Benghazi Records
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/3429527/posts?page=17#17
Thanks for the analysis; pinging it out...
It has never been adequately explained how these two statements can be reconciled without there being some criminal activity in the process:
1. Hillary said she never received or sent email on her personal server that was marked classified at the time.
2. The FBI has said that they have recovered 1,000’s of emails containing classified information from Hillary’s server. Info that should never have traveled outside the secure state dept. server.
Some method of stripping the classified headings (inc. summarizing, cutting/pasting, etc.) from the documents before they were sent to Hillary’s server was done and that is criminal activity . Who instructed it to be done, who did it, why it was done, and how it was done are under the purview of the FBI investigation and have not been revealed publicly. There’s been plenty of speculation, some of which no doubt is on target.
Recall how Petraeus and Broadwood did it. They had a shared email account and left emails for each other in the Draft box of the email account. The emails were never sent or received.
Devious people always think themselves much cleverer than the last doofus who got caught.
PING!!
Article, comments, esp. #17 and #23 through #27
Thanks, WildHighlander57
1) A criminal hearing/interview where the partners have AGREE to what can be asked !!!
Please help me out with this that “criminals” can demand what can be asked and NOT be asked. What justice world are we living in, hmmm ???