I'd really like to see proof. Which, has what to do with your original question?
BTW, I'll try to find the article.
The article was about the dog-tosser suing the owner of the dog. Your comment was about the woman whose dog was tossed. You said she was on worker's comp, something I didn't see mentioned in the article about the dog-tosser's lawsuit. I don't see the connection between the dog-tosser's lawsuit against the woman & a few others and that she's on worker's comp from his actions.