Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

PJ bloggers strike again! :)
1 posted on 09/13/2004 12:58:21 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: anymouse

So you WERE wearing your PJs while freeping? Good job. Excellent in fact.


2 posted on 09/13/2004 1:01:37 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
I especially like the Boston connection.......mmm, where would that lead take us back to? kerry and his campaign may yet fall with danrather.
4 posted on 09/13/2004 1:03:27 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Here's another theory for the tin-foil it's W's fault crowd. The forger was actually working for the Bush campaign and deliberately included lots of clues that the document was forged (modern fonts, superscript, and an anachronistic reference to pressure from an already retired officer). The forger knew that CBS/Rather would run with the documents with minimal investigation, made careless by their orgasmic state of ecstasy at the thought they were about to derail the Bush campaign, only to have the obvious forgery discredit them.


5 posted on 09/13/2004 1:04:18 PM PDT by VRWCmember (I actually ignored this thread before I posted to it. jfk, 08/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

This dirt was dug up in 1988, by The Dukakis campaign.

The lead dirty trick-guy was John Sasso.

Sasso has just recently joined the Kerry campaign.


6 posted on 09/13/2004 1:04:24 PM PDT by Redcoat LI ("I am the great and powerful Kerry! Look at my medals!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Same guy who forged the Niger uranium documents in the name of Niger's foreign minister, Allele Elhadj Habibou, even though he had been deposed a decade earlier?


7 posted on 09/13/2004 1:04:34 PM PDT by gutshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
LOL Great find
"He relied upon The Boston Globe to get the date of Staudt's retirement correct and, of course, relying on The Boston Globe for anything at all will most likely bite you in your ass."
8 posted on 09/13/2004 1:04:41 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (GEORGE WASHINGTON is nothing like HO CHI MINH as stated by Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Someone with access to Lexis/Nexis.

Or the Globe's internal archive system.

Hmmm....


10 posted on 09/13/2004 1:05:11 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

That's whats so funny about them trying to jump through hoops trying to show that it was "possible" to use the fonts back then. Even so, they still blew it with the actual details of the memo.


11 posted on 09/13/2004 1:06:01 PM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
Boston Globe--and Kerry's the Massachusetts Senator.

Tell the forger that he can't depend on anything he reads in the MSM to be accurate...

Nice catch, bump

12 posted on 09/13/2004 1:07:07 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

That blows me away. I could very well see where this person thought Staudt did not retire b/c of this faulty article.


13 posted on 09/13/2004 1:08:31 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Good work. I tried Googling some of the oddities of language in the memo, but I ran out of time to stick with it.....anyone else who wants can take over. Specifically, I found it odd that one of the memos ends with the phrase (typed exactly like this:
"...him to get in to" rather than the more common "..get into"
Also,
"sugar coat" rather than "sugar-coat" or "sugarcoat".


14 posted on 09/13/2004 1:08:46 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana ("Kerry-Edwards" or "Bury Vets' Words"? or "Verry Leftwards"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse; VRWCmember

> Why Did the Forger Incorrectly Believe ...

Because all they had to work with was the actual Bush
docs released by the WH, and Barnes' imagination, which
has always had calendar problems.

> The forger was actually working for the Bush campaign
> and deliberately ...

Doubtful. This was not a Rove, Nader or Clinton sting.
Until it happened, no one could have counted on such an
utter lack of skepticism in the entire chain of custody
of these memos. Further, someone will trace these back
to their source, and if a Rove case could be made, you
can bet that Rather would spare no expense to prove it.

This was either an inept Dem-sourced fraud, or an
internet prank that spun out of control.


16 posted on 09/13/2004 1:10:42 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

bump!


17 posted on 09/13/2004 1:13:10 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Another Jammy Whammy!!


33 posted on 09/13/2004 2:56:16 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Hot Diggity Dog!


34 posted on 09/13/2004 8:47:52 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Thanks! Good find, Bookmarking, Bump, Bttt


35 posted on 09/13/2004 9:15:52 PM PDT by Not now, Not ever! (john F'n kerry reminds me of a horse, I'm just not sure which end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson