Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MCCHRYSTAL TESTS CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS
hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org ^ | June 22, 2010 | Tom Skypek

Posted on 06/22/2010 12:21:40 PM PDT by hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

President Barack Obama has to relieve Gen. McChrystal of his command. I don’t really see how this ends any other way. I guess McChrystal could tender his resignation, but even that would be a slap in the face to the Office of the President. If McChrystal did not have faith in his civilian leadership, he should have resigned. Civilian control of the military is one of the pillars of this Republic. To disrespect the commander-in-chief in such a blatant manner is an affront to the Office of the President and borders on insubordination.

(Excerpt) Read more at hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: afghanistanwar; barackobama; birthcertificate

1 posted on 06/22/2010 12:21:41 PM PDT by hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

Can anyone tell me what McCrystal is supposed to have said that has the press citing separation of powers and the chain of command? Have you ever noticed that the same press have never raised this concern when the Kenyan was taking auto companies and giving them to his financial supporters? Really, what did McCrystal say that is out of bounds?


2 posted on 06/22/2010 12:25:34 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

We disrespected Clinton all the time.
And he deserved it.
Obama deserves it and more.
That a General Officer disrespected “The One” says volumes.
And warms my heart.
A leader who does not engender feelings of respect from the troops is no leader but a mockery of the trust granted to the office he holds, however illegitimately.


3 posted on 06/22/2010 12:26:46 PM PDT by Darksheare (Proudly buzzkilling the illusion of confidence in the progress of humanity for 35 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

Where is the BC? Why should a general bow to an usurper?


4 posted on 06/22/2010 12:27:12 PM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2539540/posts

“A scathing memo by Eikenberry describing Karzai as an unreliable partner was leaked to the press last fall.”

And we had trolls here pushing for a removal of Karzai and the installation of the guy that IRAN approved of.


5 posted on 06/22/2010 12:30:15 PM PDT by Darksheare (Proudly buzzkilling the illusion of confidence in the progress of humanity for 35 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

“To disrespect the commander-in-chief in such a blatant manner is an affront to the Office of the President and borders on insubordination.”....

And for the so called “commander-in-chief” to disrespect the American people in such a blatant manner is treason!!!


6 posted on 06/22/2010 12:34:52 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

No. That is a lie. Obama, the Democrats and people behind the ‘administration’ test military-civilian relations and connections.


7 posted on 06/22/2010 12:38:50 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

A Magnificent Opus by the General.

Bravo, Sir!

He must’ve had it with the nincompoops and their backstabbing shenanigans.

What will it be? Relieved of command? Resigned?

Will Obama keep him on..........


8 posted on 06/22/2010 12:41:06 PM PDT by swarthyguy (KIDS! Deficit, Debt,Taxes!Pfft Lookit the bright side of our legacy -Ummrika is almost SmokFrei!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
General McChrystal has stated that he voted for the President in the 2008 election.

As far as the General is concerned, the President is no usurper.

9 posted on 06/22/2010 12:42:21 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

That was quite a coordinated slandering and besmirching of Karzai, though he must’ve known it when weekly videocons with the WH were stopped under Obie.


10 posted on 06/22/2010 12:42:29 PM PDT by swarthyguy (KIDS! Deficit, Debt,Taxes!Pfft Lookit the bright side of our legacy -Ummrika is almost SmokFrei!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

Barack Hussein Obama doesn’t fill his roll as Commander in Chief. Read my tagline.


11 posted on 06/22/2010 12:46:11 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
Rather than debate the intricacies of protocol, let's step back.

The President's chief of staff is leaving.

His budget chief is leaving.

His top general is basically daring the President to fire him.

His poll numbers have fallen off a cliff.

His Senate majority leader currently stands to lose his job.

A federal judge just issued an injunction against his directive in the Gulf of Mexico.

It's taken a year and a half, but it now looks like all the wheels are coming off.

12 posted on 06/22/2010 12:50:53 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org
To disrespect the commander-in-chief in such a blatant manner is an affront to the Office of the President and borders on insubordination

Not the brightest writer we have ever seen. If the president was ever a citizen of another country, he is not the legitimate holder of office and the oath is first to the constitution then to the chain of command.

13 posted on 06/22/2010 1:00:22 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org

Left out relevent factors.


14 posted on 06/22/2010 1:13:07 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Bingo.


15 posted on 06/22/2010 1:13:50 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
As far as the General is concerned, the President is no usurper.

So Widawake has now embraced and is prepared to defend the assertion that General McChrystal's vote detirmines whether Obama is a usurper or not all by itself, and the definition of "Natural born citizen" in use at the constitutional convention has nothing to do with it?

Sad.

16 posted on 06/22/2010 1:27:30 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Zero and his thugs talk about Karzai’s corruption while overlooking the most corrupt government in American History.
17 posted on 06/22/2010 1:55:41 PM PDT by Americanexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy; Americanexpat

Yeah, and Obie trying to be a tough guy with the recount talk in Afghanistan.
Probably because the votes that were paid for weren’t enough.


18 posted on 06/22/2010 2:00:12 PM PDT by Darksheare (Proudly buzzkilling the illusion of confidence in the progress of humanity for 35 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
So Widawake has now embraced and is prepared to defend the assertion that General McChrystal's vote detirmines whether Obama is a usurper or not all by itself, and the definition of "Natural born citizen" in use at the constitutional convention has nothing to do with it? Sad.

Allow me to repost, verbatim, what I posted above:

As far as the General is concerned, the President is no usurper.

19 posted on 06/22/2010 2:26:06 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson