Posted on 05/20/2016 5:04:47 AM PDT by philman_36
Amendments...
H.AMDT.592 (A062)
Amends: H.R.2822
Sponsor: Rep Huffman, Jared [CA-2] (offered 7/7/2015)
AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION:
Amendment inserted language to end the practice of allowing groups to display Confederate flags on federally managed cemeteries.
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
An amendment to prohibit the use of funds to implement National Park Service Director's Order 61 as it pertains to allowing a grave in any Federal cemetery to be decorated with a Confederate flag.
STATUS:
7/7/2015 7:30pm:
Amendment (A062) offered by Mr. Huffman. (consideration: CR H4818; text: CR H4818)
7/7/2015 7:32pm:
On agreeing to the Huffman amendment (A062) Agreed to by voice vote.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Huffman
Mr. HUFFMAN. Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment.
The Clerk read as follows:
At the end of the bill, before the short title, insert the following:
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 333, the gentleman from California and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. HUFFMAN. Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I appreciate very much the bipartisan support and passage of my earlier amendment, which would end the practice of concessionaires in our national parks selling Confederate flags and memorabilia of the Confederacy.
We now, with this Interior Appropriations bill, have a second opportunity to speak on this very important national debate that we are having regarding symbols of the Confederacy. This additional amendment will end the practice of allowing groups to display Confederate flags on federally managed cemeteries.
The American Civil War was fought, in Abraham Lincoln's words, to ``save the last best hope of Earth.'' We can honor that history without celebrating the Confederate flag and all of the dreadful things that it symbolizes.
I request an ``aye'' of my colleagues, and I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Huffman).
The amendment was agreed to.
ping
Congressional Record > July 07, 2015
Amendment Offered by Mr. Huffman
Mr. HUFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment.
The Clerk read as follows:
At the end of the bill, before the short title, insert the following:
Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the gentleman's amendment.
This amendment, as Chairman Calvert pointed out, is consistent with
I mean why not just end every bill with, "and for stuff we just feel like stealing?"
For the amendments, man, for the amendments...like the ones I posted.
When bills can't pass as stand alone bills on their own merit they're attached to 'must pass' bills as amendments.
And if the opposition pushes against the bill or the amendments they're presented to the public as being against the main purpose of the bill.
"I can't understand why anybody would be against appropriations for the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. These are important government agencies and their work is beneficial to America and the American people! And because my opponents are against this bill they are Fascists on a par with Adolf Hitler himself, demagogues of the highest order and counterproductive to America's prosperity! This bill must be passed or America as we know it is doomed!"
/illustrative BS argument on floor of Congress/to the press
See? Weren't you moved by my passion and illogic?
Snip...
Posturing or making a point?
thanks!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.