First released in August 2023, the study, ... affirms that...
And then, we get this:
If true then there can be...
So--Is it conclusive, is it affirming, or is it still uncertain?
This explains why natural immunity does not protect against variants (and possibly why those with the jabs have it worse).
I spoke with my stepson yesterday and he told me that 2 weeks ago he was bed ridden with covid. He was so weak he could only make it to the bathroom for 2 days straight, this after previously having the original virus.
There’s no reason whatsoever for my stepson to have been in bed for 2 days after having the original virus if what he caught was just a natural ‘mutation’.
Additionally, I know exactly when I caught each and every variant due to symptoms, which defies the mutation/natural immunity basis. The last infection was about 2 weeks ago following the company xmas party in the nearest big/blue city (which is a pit of infected, based upon my own sources).
To date, 100% of everyone with whom I’ve spoken has been infected with the most recent variant, which for most people in our region means a 24–48-hour flu and, if you’re unlucky, about 2 weeks of getting over the chest congestion.
My own infection - full disclosure - was just a mild ‘cold’ (with classic covid physical symptoms) for about 24 hours...just like all the others following the original virus in March 2020 (I have a strong immune system).
What is interesting is how such a prolific virus - which apparently is NOT resulting in high hospitalization numbers - is being omitted almost entirely in media reports...almost like they WANT people exposed to it.
It’s a peer-reviewed article.
Does your precious peer-review mean anything?