[John Semmens]

ping

[Political Junkie Too]

Biden has the special "senior immunity" that is offered to Presidents over the age of 80. Currently, only Presidents Biden and Carter qualify.

Sorry, Donald... so close...

-PJ

[Candor7]

“we looked at this very carefully and determined that the federal murder statute does apply to the executive branch. So, if the president orders that someone be killed it is considered a lawful act. President Obama ordered more than 500 drone strikes resulting in between 300 and 800 civilian deaths, which the DOJ has determined were completely legal.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

UNder what enumerated presidential power in sectio 2 of the constitution? Waging war requires the declaration of COngress.Using deadly force against an American requires approval of Congress or a warrant of Death from the judicial system.

Otherwise hat’s genocide.

And this was done without a single finding as is required for the assassination of the enemies if the UNited STates who are marked for death?

All is now political. If the president is Democrat , he can commit genocide, buit if the president is Republican......
he can be sued ar criminalized for a private, not a public act?

What is public or private is decided by whether the preside gt is Democrat or Republican.

During the Census the geo-location in longitude and latitude of every household in America is peserved. All they have do do is enter the coordinates and send you a cruise missile or drone strike.And this fact does not bother anyone that the president can unilaterally kill a US citizen?

These fascists are stupid as all get out.

[GranTorino]

Why wasn’t this taken up during fast and furious?
Cause were screwed,that’s why.

[Seaplaner]

Hobbs countered, saying "how is a person who moves into an unoccupied house supposed to know it's not theirs for the taking? It is the responsibility of the person who claims to own the property to prove their ownership. Until that is done, why should law enforcement assume that those physically present in the structure have no right to be there? Since the squatters are otherwise homeless why shouldn't they avail themselves of an apparently abandoned dwelling? People wealthy enough to own vacant properties can afford to incur the burden of going through the time and effort to have the court determine who owes what to who?"

Satire? Not really, just re-statement for clarity.

Thanks, John, for another fine column.