Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fury
They didn’t attest that they were alternate Electors - they attested that they were THE Electors for Arizona.

And?

Two sides can legally and genuinely contest that they should be the legitimate electors, without criminalizing one size.

It's happened before in US history.

Now if they forge a signature or seal or if you can prove that they are knowingly giving false information, then that's another thing.

Prove that these people in Arizona don't believe that the election was rigged in AZ and that they should be the legitimate electors.

44 posted on 04/27/2024 1:42:49 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

Re: 44 - yes, two sides can disagree.

But it is the State LEGISLATURE that chooses and ”certifies” Electors. Period.

A group of people can’t meet in a basement and then pass off their slate of Electors as Certified. I mean they can, but they aren’t acting as the Legislature and so have no authority. No amount of wishing makes it so.

They knowingly misrepresented themselves as THE Certified Electors, when in fact they were no such thing.


50 posted on 04/27/2024 7:39:53 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson