To: freepatriot32; Owl_Eagle
"Even after they were cleared by police, Bundchen's people have wrongly maintained and implied Paul and Janelle deserved the humiliating treatment they received. " said the couples attorney, Frank Harrigan. At this point, based upon everything we know, it appears Bundchen and others who conspired with her had no intention of paying the reward when they made the offer. I would sue the little b**** for a lot more than the $5,000 reward. We're talking falsely accusing someone of a crime, leading to an arrest at gunpoint. That equals public humiliation and a lot of personal anguish and fear. How much does this little twit have? I'd go for half of it.
8 posted on
12/10/2004 6:05:33 AM PST by
HenryLeeII
(Democrats have killed more Americans than the Soviets and Nazis combined!)
To: HenryLeeII
I'd sue the bitch too, even if the lawyer took most of it. Also I feel sorry for the dog, no wonder it kept running away.
17 posted on
12/10/2004 6:31:35 AM PST by
Ditter
To: HenryLeeII
said the couples attorney, Frank Harrigan. At this point, based upon everything we know, it appears Bundchen and others who conspired with her had no intention of paying the reward when they made the offer.I was thinknig of this earlier this is almost the dictionary definition of fraud and on top of that conspireing to commit fraud is a seperate felony in and of itself.Her and her entorouge could be looking at jailtime after this is all done on top of the lawsuiits that are sure to come out of this.It would have been a lot cheaper for her to pay the 5 thou she promised to give out as a reward
18 posted on
12/10/2004 6:41:15 AM PST by
freepatriot32
(http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson