Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anyone catch the remarks on FOX how Dems made sure Lieberman would be ousted?

Posted on 08/08/2006 8:08:29 PM PDT by AZRepublican

Pretty interesting strategy revealed how the RATS made sure Lieberman would go down in defeat. They petitioned independents to cross party lines to register as Democrat, which 14,000 independents did in order to vote in Democratic primary in order to stick it to Lieberman.

By stacking the deck against old Joe they can now sing how their anti-war stance is what defeated him. Yeah right...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: connecticut; demprimary; dirtytricks; election2006; electioncongress; joementum; lamont; lieberman; traitors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 08/08/2006 8:08:33 PM PDT by AZRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Lieberman kicking butt.

Going independent.


2 posted on 08/08/2006 8:09:27 PM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
Defeated them RIGHT to THEIR defeat.

They know not what they do.

3 posted on 08/08/2006 8:09:42 PM PDT by NordP (America: There are more Patriots than Punks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Doubtful. This is what Lieberman is going to do to them, if he goes into the fall election as independent.


4 posted on 08/08/2006 8:10:40 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

I think the Lamont team made a mistake sabotaging Joe's Web site.

Something like that is really underhanded and will just make Joe fight harder in the General Election.

I hope they both spend a fortune fighting for this 'safe seat'.


5 posted on 08/08/2006 8:11:52 PM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
By stacking the deck against old Joe they can now sing how their anti-war stance is what defeated him. Yeah right...

Out of curiosity, what could have persuaded those independants to vote out Lieberman?

I daresay his support for the war has made him unpopular with some independants as well as anti-war Democrats.

6 posted on 08/08/2006 8:12:17 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

they may have won this battle with that tactic, but I believe they will lose the war because of the same move.

IMHO, these independencts will go with Joe in the general elction.


7 posted on 08/08/2006 8:12:21 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

This is a good thing..

It peels the mask off the commies who now control the DNC.


8 posted on 08/08/2006 8:12:21 PM PDT by Armedanddangerous (Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
I hope he runs as an independent and splits the RAT votes, but unlike other Dims I don't think he has the vengeance bone.
9 posted on 08/08/2006 8:14:14 PM PDT by 12th_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Armedanddangerous
True. Helping. promoting, or organizing internecine conflicts among one's adversaries is a good thing -if one manages to preserve a modicum of cohesion on one's own side.
10 posted on 08/08/2006 8:15:21 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Which side will Joe be on when he wins as an independant?? It's clear that the dems cut him off at the knees, why would he side with them?


11 posted on 08/08/2006 8:15:31 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

To run as an Independent, one must no longer be a Democrat (officially).

Thus, the Democrats just lost a Senator tonight to a switch to Independent.

There are now only 43 Democratic Party Senators in Congress, plus Independents Jeffords and Lieberman.

12 posted on 08/08/2006 8:16:39 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
All Hail The Kos Kiddies, Rulers of the Democrat Party.

Howard Dean is now The Baby Doctor.

13 posted on 08/08/2006 8:16:40 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
To hell with them all. Lieberman seems to be a good man, but a huge liberal none-the-less. That lamont character is no different, except he is a FAAAAR left wing liberal. Either way, a liberal is going to have that seat. It would be wise to forget about it and focus on more important battles elsewhere.
14 posted on 08/08/2006 8:17:20 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091

why would he side with them?

because he's a liberal, and because he's already said that he'll caucus with the dems if elected as I


15 posted on 08/08/2006 8:17:43 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

This happened out here too in a Republican primary .. some moonbats I know were gloating about how they screwed the primary by registering as Republicans.. they called themselves RINOS.. Republican In Name Only...


16 posted on 08/08/2006 8:17:43 PM PDT by Bubble Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
According to one bit of analysis on Fox this evening, the Democrats don't have to worry--whether Lamont or Lieberman wins in the fall, they can count on that seat since the Republican candidate is so unlikely to win. They may ignore that race and concentrate on states where they think they can pick up a seat now held by a Republican.

Lieberman may have offended the more leftwing Democrats who vote in the primary by his support for the war in Iraq and his support for Israel, but on 95% of the issues he's a reliable liberal vote for the Democrats.

17 posted on 08/08/2006 8:17:52 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091

He just said that he is a progressive Democrat with a conviction of the necessity of a strong national defense and security.


18 posted on 08/08/2006 8:17:57 PM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 12th_Monkey

True, Joe is a classy guy. His politics are not even close to mine, but I respect him. They turned on him for supporting the war? Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't 97 other Senators vote that way too?


19 posted on 08/08/2006 8:18:26 PM PDT by Feiny (drunk, crazy and naked streaking isn't something that can be considered a normal, fun thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass

I'm watching the "winner" Ned Lamonte with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton standing behind him. I guess they got the jew, eh?


20 posted on 08/08/2006 8:19:59 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (You! Shake your junk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson