Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/22/2019 4:33:43 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

The Boeing 737 MAX also lands on the ground.


2 posted on 12/22/2019 4:35:33 PM PST by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

If NASA needs astronauts for this, well, I volunteer......

I volunteer Hillary Clinton.

Just throw her in the capsule like it’s a van.


3 posted on 12/22/2019 4:38:28 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Boeing did something Russia has been doing for 60 years. Good enough but I’d hardly call it “history making”.


4 posted on 12/22/2019 4:44:20 PM PST by Artemis Webb (There are only two genders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The Chinese-bribed media has been bashing Boeing all week long. Please let’s not join them in attacking this great American company.


5 posted on 12/22/2019 4:44:42 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Boeing engineering. It didn’t get to where it was supposed to go.


6 posted on 12/22/2019 4:50:45 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Give me a break( reporter), I’ll see your random location parachute enabled vertical ground contacts and raise you 133 precision horizontal landings: ( The Space Shuttle). This article makes it sound like we are decades behind.


10 posted on 12/22/2019 5:10:47 PM PST by takebackaustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

There was a full day of rocket engine testing at Stennis yesterday. Multiple starts every hour. Continued well into the evening.


12 posted on 12/22/2019 5:24:52 PM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Technically yes, 1st one designed to make ground landings, but more than one Apollo boilerplate landed at White Sands during abort tests. Still waiting for modern era Boeing to impress me, so far they get a big yawn.


13 posted on 12/22/2019 5:32:17 PM PST by docman57 (Retired but still on Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Oh and we have landed on the ground vertically after a visual approach to pick the precise landing spot, from orbit, several times. On the MOON.

The descent module of the LEM being single use, they designed engines to cut when some probes touched the ground, and designed the legs to crumple to absorbe energylike a modern car in an collision. But Armstrong hand flew it and greased his landing and there was so little crushing that the drop from the ladder to step onto the moon was much higher than planned for.


14 posted on 12/22/2019 5:39:49 PM PST by takebackaustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Are these the same people who made B 17’s? I wouldn’t buy a popsicle made by them now.


16 posted on 12/22/2019 5:47:35 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


27 posted on 12/22/2019 9:43:43 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Dear Mr. Kotter, #Epsteindidntkillhimself - Signed, Epstein's Mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
There was a time when American spacecraft landing on the ground was commonplace.

31 posted on 12/23/2019 5:14:41 AM PST by jmcenanly ("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson