Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Silicon Valley Bank Crisis Explained: What Should Investors Do Now?
Summa Money ^ | 03/13/2023 | G O’FIACHRA

Posted on 03/13/2023 9:35:56 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Silicon Valley Bank wasn’t an ordinary bank. It became the go-to bank for venture-funded technology startups in the most fertile business environment for innovation over the past 50 years, Silicon Valley.

As business boomed over the past few years, Silicon Valley Bank made a big bet; it would invest in a virtual risk-free investment: government debt. The bank would earn just under 1.80% by committing capital for a relatively short duration (< 3-4 years).

But management failed to account for a few critical yet tectonic shifts. The first major underestimation was that the Federal Reserve would hike rates as rapidly and for as long as they did.

As yields go up, prices of bonds go down. And so Silicon Valley Bank had a balance sheet filled with “unrealized losses” – not a problem if they could hold the bonds to maturity.

When the Fed hiked rates, the decline in price of debt purchased was a sucker punch to SVB. Another shoe to drop came when SVB’s primary client base, high-potential technology firms, struggled to grow amid the slowing economy. They needed to draw on deposits to a greater extent and that, in turn, created a liquidity crunch for SVB.

They had to take a loss of $1.5 billion on their bond positions to fund withdrawals. As a consequence, management announced it would sell a portion of ownership to raise $2.25 billion. Disaster struck when it failed to raise the capital needed. As the dominos fell, the FDIC seized the bank.

Further amplifying the severity of the situation, it is estimated that 97.3% of accounts were not fully covered because FDIC insurance is limited to just $250,000.

Key Points

  1. Silicon Valley Bank invested in government debt to earn just under 2% by committing capital for a relatively short duration, but the Fed hiked rates more rapidly and for longer than expected, causing the decline in price of debt purchased and creating a liquidity crunch for the bank.
  2. Silicon Valley Bank had to take a loss of $1.5 billion on their bond positions to fund withdrawals, failed to raise capital, and was seized by the FDIC.
  3. Individuals and businesses should consider moving their funds to systemically important banks that are more likely to receive a bailout in times of crisis, and the FDIC limit of $250,000 for business accounts should be increased.

What Happens Next?

Over the weekend, fears of contagion spread. Conversations were furious in the halls of power, and by Sunday evening the government stepped in and claimed that depositors would be able to access funds.

At the time of our research, futures were up on the news. We would NOT be buying the green tape, not even close; it’s clear risks are still high. Evidence of the risks permeating the banking sector now is the announcement over the weekend that Signature Bank has also hit a brick wall. It’s notable that the market has fallen into the red as the markets opened this morning.

It’s also worth pointing out that Warren Buffett sold a bunch of his holdings in banks last quarter, including: U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon, and Ally Financial. Those transactions may be as good a sign as any that all is not well under the hood of the banking sector.

What Should You Do Next?

If you have funds at a local bank, it is worth considering a move to a systemically important bank – or better yet, a combination of them – that is more likely to receive a bailout in times of crisis. While centralizing U.S. capital into a core few banks poses its own risks, the reality is the larger banks are often better-resourced and better-connected to the halls of power so, when financial waters get choppy, they can pull the parachute rip cord to save themselves.

A final note is that an FDIC limit of $250,000 clearly is too low for business accounts, who must meet payroll and other operating expenses. If a major change is to take effect from this crisis, that is surely on the shortlist.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: bankcollapse; svb; treasuries

1 posted on 03/13/2023 9:35:56 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Notice they keep saying depositors, not shareholders.......ESG,ESG ESG...See how well it works for investors........


2 posted on 03/13/2023 9:38:44 AM PDT by Hambone 1934 (Dems love playing Nazis.....The republicans love helping them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What Should Investors Do Now?

Barney Frank being on the Bank board is a major red flag.

3 posted on 03/13/2023 9:43:56 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
And he's got boobs that would make Pete Buttigieg jealous!


4 posted on 03/13/2023 9:53:28 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Gun laws empower criminals. Guns empower the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
the reality is the larger banks are often better-resourced and better-connected to the halls of power so, when financial waters get choppy, they can pull the parachute rip cord to save themselves.

The entire banking industry paired with government is a criminal enterprise.

5 posted on 03/13/2023 9:55:59 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
”As yields go up, prices of bonds go down. “

Those holding existing long-term fixed-rate mortgages at 3% should experience the same effect. If new long-term fixed-rate mortgages yield 6%, then the older mortgages will fall in value.

The fuse on this bomb has been burning a long time.

6 posted on 03/13/2023 10:09:20 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No, it was the go to bank for woke crappola.

To those who had uninsured funds, die. No sympathy.


7 posted on 03/13/2023 10:14:10 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Very ironic that SVB ostensibly went bankrupt - holding the BEST and most liquid securities in the world - US Treasuries

One assumes there are banks out there stuffed with more risky debt instruments - that have even bigger losses due to the rapid rise in interest rates


8 posted on 03/13/2023 10:14:28 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

The talking points have been sent. It is all Trump’s fault for “deregulating the banks.” Just like the train derailment in East Palestine. All Trump’s fault.


9 posted on 03/13/2023 10:18:31 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t know but I was mighty glad this morning to see my GLD, SLV, GDX and GDXJ numbers, not to mention some individual miners.


10 posted on 03/13/2023 12:39:21 PM PDT by Chuckster (Friends don't let friends eat farmed fish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson