Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I don't believe in the Big Bang Theory, but this seems like a glaringly obvious hole in the theory.
1 posted on 01/10/2024 6:24:18 AM PST by gop4lyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: gop4lyf

The speed limit was higher back then. No cops around.


2 posted on 01/10/2024 6:28:10 AM PST by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

I’ve actually asked that question myself although I didn’t look up the size of the ‘known universe’. It seems to big based on standard physics, unless you get a little meta-physical and utilize Einstein’s concepts of relativity where even light is relative and can even be bent by gravity, but what if the speed of light was relative to the expansion of the universe and not a pure constant as if it would be the same if there was no expansion. In other words, the universe is expanding faster than they suggest it is and you can’t calculate it accurately because of the disparity of perception/measurement of light as your method.


3 posted on 01/10/2024 6:29:24 AM PST by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

It shouldn’t, based on their figures.

I did figure out that, if the universe was condensed to a cube where it had the density of osmium, the most dense element on the periodic table, it would be 9.404 light years across.

You can check my figures to see if I missed anything.

The amount of mass that is thought to be in the universe is 1.59486x10^55 kg. This works out to be 1.59486x10^58 g.

The density of osmium is 22.6 g/cm^3, which if you divide the initial mass by the density, you would end up with a cube 7.056902654867x10^56 cm^3. If you cube root this, you would end up with 8.903034210977x10^18 cm on each side, which works out to be 8.903034210977x10^13 km, on each side.

The speed of light is 300,000km/sec. It would take 2.967678057506x10^8 seconds to traverse the distance. This works out to be 4.946130095844x10^6 light minutes. This works out to be 8.2435015974x10^4 light hours. This works out to be 3.434812566558 x10^3 light days. Finally, the distance equals approximately 9.404 light years.

The universe, when condensed to the same density as osmium would be a cube with a side as long as 9.404 light years.


4 posted on 01/10/2024 6:29:25 AM PST by Jonty30 (In a nuclear holocaust, there is always a point in time where the meat is cooked to perfection. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

The speed ogylightnus 186000 mps. But the expansion of the universe is not constricted by this doeed


5 posted on 01/10/2024 6:29:31 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

Everything is bigger in Texas!


6 posted on 01/10/2024 6:30:46 AM PST by Oscar in Batangas (An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

The expansion of the universe is not regulated by the speed of light. Travel within the universe, is.


7 posted on 01/10/2024 6:31:20 AM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

just remember that you’re standing on a planet that’s evolving, and revolving at 900 mph.

it’s orbiting at 19 miles per second, so it’s reckoned, a sun that is the source of all our power.


8 posted on 01/10/2024 6:33:04 AM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

It’s not just the speed of the particles expanding space, but the expansion of the “nothingness” between them. The expansion of space has nothing to do with moving objects, and is not limited by the velocity of light. Also, the Universe expands at a rate, not a speed.

There are decades of books written on this, me collapsing it into a soundbite is beyond my meager monkey brain.


11 posted on 01/10/2024 6:36:21 AM PST by BBQToadRibs2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

The universe itself is expanding faster than the speed of light simply because there is no restriction within the universe preventing it from doing so. Who knows what speed restrictions there are in the brane that our universe exists within? Within the universe itself, light is constrained to traveling at 300KPS which is why we can’t see the entire universe because there hasn’t been enough time to see the light from the far ends of the universe.


12 posted on 01/10/2024 6:38:34 AM PST by Fish Speaker (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Oh, and, "Let's Go Brandon!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

The latest theory is the idea that shortly after the big band, there was a period of “inflation”of space itself.

Supposedly, due to this theory extension, space itself continues to expand and enlarge — ALL SPACE, EVRYWHERE.

Since light travels in space, such an expansion would also “stretch” the wavelength of emitted light as it traveled, causing the so-called “red-shift, which says that things further away are traveling aways faster the further away they are.

Space, itself, isn’t just empty, but has properties — goes the theory extansion.


13 posted on 01/10/2024 6:39:39 AM PST by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

If the Universe is 94 billion light years across, what is on the outside?


15 posted on 01/10/2024 6:41:05 AM PST by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf
Informative commentary about this topic was published in Forbes in 2019. Worthy of thoughtful consideration:

Size of the Universe & the Speed of Light"

16 posted on 01/10/2024 6:42:52 AM PST by glennaro (Never give up ... never give in ... never surrender ... and enjoy every minute of doing so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

The size of the universe is not a “yardstick” concept. What would happen if somehow you gotto the very edge and ventured beyond? All these theories about the origin, age and size of the universe are theoretical , unproven concepts that are the philosophical , even mystical musings of agnostic men. Human beings are the only species with a brain capable of mysticism. The story of civilization is how those mystical thoughts have been expressed and the insights and values that evolved from them.


17 posted on 01/10/2024 6:45:40 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

The Universe was smaller back then..................


18 posted on 01/10/2024 6:45:44 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

The speed of light is constant - time is not.


19 posted on 01/10/2024 6:48:18 AM PST by Aevery_Freeman (I didn't mis-gender you, You did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

Climate change, of course. (Someone had to say it)


24 posted on 01/10/2024 7:01:05 AM PST by ZinGirl (Now a grandma ....can't afford a tagline :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

If you could go to the very edge of the universe, what’s on the other side that it’s expanding in to?


28 posted on 01/10/2024 7:04:54 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

I recommend books by Brian Greene, and, Paul Halpern. They both have books on this topic.

What is really mind boggling is that the signs all point to things keeping going until the heat death of the universe at more that 1 Trillion years in the future.

THEN Quantum Mechanics kicks in and who knows WHAT will happen.


32 posted on 01/10/2024 7:10:46 AM PST by Conan the Librarian (Conan the Sailing Librarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

This is addressed in virtually every physics course dealing with the big bang and the rapid expansion (inflationary period) that immediately followed. It takes a bit of reading, and some thinking. There are still many questions on the current theory - we’ve got a lot of work to do there. It’s far better to devote time to the N lies (where N is a very large number) dealing with climate change, CO2, etc. Going the woke route on climate change WILL lead to disaster. Not even close to kidding.


33 posted on 01/10/2024 7:12:44 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gop4lyf

Might I recommend some visual aid, indeed there are more questions than answers as you come to realize that the more you know the more you don’t know.

Go to youtube and ‘favorite’ (that way searches pop up automatically) Kosmo, SEA, (especially) and Astrum for starters - there are many others that are excellent also too numerous to mention. If you don’t have a big screen TV you’re gonna want one!

Also do a search for the JWST (James Webb Space Telescope) and see some of the new findings, staggering discoveries that are turning astronomy and astrophysics on their heads.


34 posted on 01/10/2024 7:14:50 AM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson