As always with this classic (sorry, no belly button girl, lol).
Posted on 02/10/2024 5:49:51 AM PST by MtnClimber
The U.N. calls its document ‘Agenda 2030.’ What it actually is is a global takeover.
Section 52 of the 91 sections of the U.N.’s Agenda 2030 global takeover plan begins, “‘We the Peoples’ are the celebrated opening words of the U.N. Charter. It is ‘We the Peoples’ who are embarking today on the road to 2030.”
However, Americans know that those opening words appeared well before the U.N. Charter, as they are (sort of) the opening words of the U.S. Constitution. When the U.N. was founded, the endearing word “rights” — so important in our republican form of government — was used repeatedly in its first documents. In the present lead document, the word “rights” is used only once, and here the opening phrase of our Constitution is blithely claimed as belonging to the U.N. Perhaps these egotists believe that their Charter is to be considered the beacon of light for the world’s nation-states.
The U.N. through its present Agenda hopes to implement a worldwide power-grab for itself over every sector of planetary life as it expressly takes it upon itself to provide for the meeting of worldwide “needs” and ”sustainability.” Our Constitution, based on a profound study of the history of government by many of the founding fathers of the USA, wanted to build a longstanding viable system based on rationality, biblical moral values, the need for stability, and the proper balance between local and federal needs and concerns. They sought to learn from the mistakes of the past, and they believed that power should be shared between private entities and the government. The idea of a federal monolith such as we have today was far from their minds, and even farther was the idea of an international monolith superseding even the monolith we have now.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Don’t get onto the train car. They are not taking you on a vacation.
As always with this classic (sorry, no belly button girl, lol).
.
Now they’re disguised as ‘sustainable’ train cars.
It’s simple. Globalist organizations are eventually, if not started by, power hungry people.
The UN, WEF, Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, Communist China are (were) all globalist oriented power freaks.
Many will. This is the bunch that will tell you what is allowed or not. Mostly not! Individuals? Pfffftttt! 🖕
Obama’s Plan to Eliminate Suburbs
The link still works
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/08/02/obama_s_plan_to_eliminate_suburbs
Obama’s Plan to Eliminate Suburbs
August 02, 2012
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Stanley Kurtz has an article adapted from Spreading the Wealth: How Obama is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities. And he’s very blunt about this. I have the book as a powerful, influential member of the media. My book is right over there, Spreading the Wealth. I have a copy. “President Obama is not a fan of America’s suburbs. Indeed, he intends to abolish them.” Now, Kurtz believes that this is an excellent way to campaign against Obama, that you don’t need to be Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative. You just need to tell people that live in the suburbs that no matter what they are, Obama’s coming for ‘em, that he has been raised to believe that it was flight from the cities that led to all of the horrible economic conditions, the rotten schools and all of this that plague America’s cities.
It’s all about people fleeing, wanting a better life, and leaving behind their poor neighbors about whom they cared nothing. How basically the suburbs are made up of a bunch of selfish, greedy people who don’t care about their fellow man. That’s how Obama was raised. And, indeed, it is what many leftists believe. And I have to tell you, folks, the constant push by Democrats to get us into mass transit is all about destroying the cities.
Let’s take a look. In California, Moonbeam Brown, the governor, is intent — what are they, $16 billion in debt? $16 billion state deficit, right? Maybe even higher. And what are they focusing on? What is one of Governor Brown’s primary objectives? This bullet train, a speed train from nowhere to nowhere.
Why? Mass transit. And the key word in mass transit is “mass.” As far as liberals are concerned, leader liberals, central planners, we are the masses. I remember Reagan I think in that famous Goldwater speech in 1964 made a point of saying how much it offended him to be considered a member of the masses, that we don’t have masses in America, that we are made up of beautifully, wonderfully free individuals, pursuing happiness and liberty. That we’re not a nameless, faceless conglomerate. We’re not “the masses” under state control. And yet this is the dream of the American left. That’s what Kurtz is writing about. Mass transit. I mean all these light rail trains, every time I see one there’s hardly anyone on ‘em. Mass transit cannot support itself in most cities. There’s no interest in it. America still has its love affair with the automobile.
But Kurtz writes here that “Obama is not a fan of America’s suburbs. Indeed, he intends to abolish them. With suburban voters set to be the swing constituency of the 2012 election, the administration’s plans for this segment of the electorate deserve scrutiny. Obama is a longtime supporter of ‘regionalism,’ the idea that the suburbs should be folded into the cities, merging schools, housing, transportation, and above all taxation. To this end, the president has already put programs in place designed to push the country toward a sweeping social transformation in a possible second term. The goal: income equalization via a massive redistribution of suburban tax money to the cities.”
UNaccountable bureaucrats. EVIL collective
I miss Rush...
Prescient, wise and missed. Rush was, of course right.
If Trump is fortunate to survive the deluge of voter fraud in November, one of his earliest acts needs to be the closure of all UN offices in the US, and elimination of all funding for all UN entities.
There is nothing ‘United’ about the United Nations. It is a money laundering vehicle for the corruptocrats of the world. I doubt that the UN has prevented one war.
Get rid of the UN and make property values soar on Blackwell’s Island next door, until they start putting our unauthorized tourists on Blackwell’s Island, of course.
Trump shoulda shut it down while he had the chance. Convert the building into a prison.
Trump should have converted it to Trump World Tower II.
But he didn't. Has he ever said one word about shutting down the UN? Anything even remotely like that?
Convert the building into a prison.
Convert the building into rubble.
Right, like he could have defunded the whole thing unilaterally.
Has he ever said one word about shutting down the UN? Anything even remotely like that?
Red herring. One cannot project one’s expectations upon any situation. That’s like asking if he “ever said one word about” getting rid of the CCP or a zillion other such things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.