To: Libloather
Sauer replied that Trump's attorneys had not raised that concern "directly And why not?
9 posted on
04/27/2024 3:29:49 PM PDT by
Fido969
(Ia)
To: Fido969
Excellent question!
They might of not brought it up in order to milk Trump of expensive hourly legal fees.
12 posted on
04/27/2024 3:36:35 PM PDT by
Macho MAGA Man
(The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
To: Fido969
Sauer replied that Trump’s attorneys had not raised that concern “directly
And why not?
Because that fits a different litigation better.
Note Thomas’ question specified that particular litigation, not “any litigation at all”.
16 posted on
04/27/2024 3:49:38 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Fido969
“Sauer replied that Trump’s attorneys had not raised that concern “directly” in the current Supreme Court case”
If you’re going to excerpt, do it completely, not with omission.
Trump’s lawyers have addressed this previously, just not here.
20 posted on
04/27/2024 4:27:37 PM PDT by
Fireone
(Who killed Obama's chef?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson