Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/08/2024 12:13:51 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RandFan

This is good news ... which is in short supply these days.

I can just guess which two female running dog commies ruled against this.


2 posted on 05/08/2024 12:25:47 AM PDT by TigersEye (Our Republic is under seige by globalist Marxists. Hold fast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Good news for Veterans is always welcome. Personally, I’m too old to get much help from this but those that served/serving are keeping this old man safe. So good for all of them. They earned it. On your feet or on your knees. We made our choice. God bless all those that serve. IMO


4 posted on 05/08/2024 12:45:56 AM PDT by Equine1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Good news for our vets.


5 posted on 05/08/2024 2:58:17 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

I used my GI Bill from service 1968-76 and it paid for tuition and some money for books all the way through my time at the North Avenue Trade School. Without it, I’d never have been ablet to graduate in 1980.


7 posted on 05/08/2024 3:09:13 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Wonderful. Now they should declare for concurrent service connected disability pay.


10 posted on 05/08/2024 4:31:28 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

I’m so tired of seeing military benefits being withheld from our veterans. It’s happening to me now. I’m glad this ruling come down.


15 posted on 05/08/2024 7:40:35 AM PDT by ducttape45 (Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan
From the article:

Thus, to summarize: Per §3322, servicemembers who are eligible for educational benefits under either the Montgomery GI Bill or the Post-9/11 GI Bill—from a period of service that could qualify for either program—can opt to credit that service toward one educational benefits program or the other," Jackson wrote in her opinion.

However, in his dissenting opinion, Thomas wrote, "The Court holds that, although Rudisill must make some election to switch from his Montgomery to Post-9/11 benefits, the statute's corresponding limits do not apply because it would reduce the amount of available benefits. In my view, the Court ignores the statutory mechanism that Congress created in favor of an interpretation that reaches a desired outcome. I respectfully dissent."

16 posted on 05/08/2024 9:31:14 AM PDT by cport (How can political capital be spent on a bunch of ingrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson