Skip to comments.
Project Exile - tough-on-guns initiative
wmdt.com ^
Posted on 01/09/2004 9:56:49 AM PST by chance33_98
Project Exile
By JOSH DAVIDSBURG (SALISBURY, MD -- WMDT) 1/8/2004
With a brand new set of advertisements Wicomico County's Project Exile is reaching the public.
The agency is receiving $140,000 from the government for the tough-on-guns initiative. Part of the money will be used to pay for a media blitz.
Assistance State's Attorney Andrew MacDonald says the money will go to spreading the word, but they've already started the program.
"We don't need money to aggressively prosecute gun crimes. We always aggressively prosecuted gun crimes," says MacDonald.
Project exile is a program started this summer that targets gun crimes. It translates to harsher penalties for criminals carrying illegal guns.
Because of Project Exile, some gun crimes now go to a federal level. That means harsher penalties, no parole and you could serve your sentence out anywhere across the country.
"If you carry an illegal gun, if you use a gun to commit a crime, you're going to jail for a long time," says MacDonald.
It's too early to know how well the program will work.
MacDonald says the word is spreading throughout the correctional system, and with the new commercials, word will spread throughout the county.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; projectexile
To: chance33_98
..."If you carry an illegal gun, if you use a gun to commit a crime, you're going to jail for a long time," says MacDonald....
They're getting the programs in place for this fall when nearly all guns will be come illegal guns.
2
posted on
01/09/2004 10:00:13 AM PST
by
the gillman@blacklagoon.com
(The only thing standing between the rule of law and anarchy is that conservatives are good losers!)
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
44 |
United Kingdom |
100.00
|
1
|
100.00
|
128
|
0.78
|
30.00
|
1
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
3
posted on
01/09/2004 10:00:27 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
To: *bang_list
Bang
To: chance33_98
With a brand new set of advertisements Wicomico County's Project Exile is reaching the public. The agency is receiving $140,000 from the government for the tough-on-guns initiative. Part of the money will be used to pay for a media blitz.
Seizing taxes to be used in a media blitz brainwashing against those who pay those taxes...
5
posted on
01/09/2004 10:02:49 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Here in Florida, we've had the 10,20,life program for several years. That and the CCW laws have really done a lot to reduce guncrime. Unless I'm mistaken, Maryland is one of the more restrictive states...
6
posted on
01/09/2004 10:13:31 AM PST
by
dixierat22
(keeping my powder dry!)
To: chance33_98
"If you carry an illegal gun, if you use a gun to commit a crime, you're going to jail for a long time" I guess this means that only the criminals need be concerned. Not!
7
posted on
01/09/2004 10:20:17 AM PST
by
drypowder
To: chance33_98
The problem is, of course, that not only are "gun crimes" numerous petty, but that it is impossible for an ordinary person to determine if he is committing a "gun crime" or not.
Is the SKS he has from Albania or Russia? One is legal, the other is not. Does his semi-automatic have a bayonet lug? If it does, he may be in violation. If it doesn't, he may not. Is the magazine that was in the pistol he bought labeled "law enforcement only, or is it an identical one not labeled in that way? It is the difference that amounts to five years in jail.
The major effect of all these insane laws, is of course, for ordinary people to figure that the only way to avoid gun crime is to not have any guns. Of course, that is probably the intent.
An unintended consequence may be that people who know they need a gun may just know they are likely to be in violation, so they might as well not worry about what laws they violate.
8
posted on
01/09/2004 10:21:15 AM PST
by
marktwain
To: chance33_98
Along with the free ride President Bush is willing to give illegal aliens he has also stated that he will extend the AWB if it comes to his desk which of course it will as various democrats are crafting even more restrictive legislation which our Republicrat legislators will fight with feather dusters and then give in and bring the AWB as it is or possibly worse to his desk for the obligatory save the children signature.I am very disappointed in the President as he seems hell bent on out Democrating the Democrats in spending on feel good social issues,foreign aid to American haters and sneak attacks on our Constitutional rights such as Patriot Act II.He is following in the footsteps of FDR,Truman IKE,JFK,Nixon,Carter,his father and Ctinton.It seems that Sophistry is a prerequisite to politics....I will vote Libertarian next election if all of this transpires as I imagine it will,even though I am not in full accord with some of their beliefs I cannot vote to destroy our Constitution....I know,Libertarians are far from perfect and Democrats are mostly socialist/communists,however it appears that our current administration is no better than the Dems and possibly worse.
To: chance33_98
Does Exile apply to crimes like possession of an illegal weapon, or only to crimes that occur independant of the possession of the weapon while the person is in possession of an illegal firearm? (For example, possession of an illegal firearm would not be an Exile offense, but selling marijuana while in possession of an illegal firearm would.) I thought it was the latter.
10
posted on
01/09/2004 11:22:03 AM PST
by
Texas Federalist
("Columbus wasn’t looking for America, but that seemed to work out for everybody, didn’t it?")
To: Texas Federalist
I thought the Second Amendment prohibited infringements like "illegal weapons"? Or has the "living constitution" moved beyond obeying the law?
Molon Labe!
11
posted on
01/09/2004 11:42:06 AM PST
by
TERMINATTOR
(DON'T BLAME ME! I Voted for McClintock)
To: TERMINATTOR
When I speak of "illegal weapons" I am thinking in the sense of a felon in possession of a handgun, not the weapon itself. Even under the broadest Second Amendment interpretation, I don't think you can make much of an argument that a law prohibiting a convicted felon from carrying a hangun is unconstitutional.
12
posted on
01/09/2004 11:49:11 AM PST
by
Texas Federalist
("It's no fun being an illegal alien." --Genesis)
To: Texas Federalist
A "felon" is someone serving a sentence. Once they have completed that, they are ex-cons. "nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" -Fifth Amendment (excerpt). A blanket loss of God given inalienable rights for a whole class of people, is not "due process of law".
13
posted on
01/09/2004 1:42:49 PM PST
by
TERMINATTOR
(DON'T BLAME ME! I Voted for McClintock)
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
This will just about cover everything. If you have a gun in your car when you're stopped for speeding....and it's in the wrong place or secured "improperly" is it an illegal gun? Just ask the power mad gun grabbers.
14
posted on
01/09/2004 8:14:35 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Travis McGee
Soon, it won't matter what state you live in.
15
posted on
01/09/2004 8:20:23 PM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: philetus
The linear projections are grim in some respects, but history usually throws out curveballs.
16
posted on
01/09/2004 9:42:44 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: TERMINATTOR
A "felon" is someone serving a sentence. Once they have completed that, they are ex-cons. "nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" -Fifth Amendment (excerpt). A blanket loss of God given inalienable rights for a whole class of people, is not "due process of law". I understand your argument and it has merit. Yet felons have deprived themselves of rights via their own conduct. There is no provision in the Constitution limiting their "sentence" to the time they spend in jail. A relinquishment of some rights after they are released can be viewed as an extension of that sentence. Nevertheless, I was trying to obtain more information on Exile because in a country where the government deprives us non-felons of so many God-given rights, I would be much less concerned about Exile if it applies only to ex-felons committing a crime while in possession of a firearm. If it applies also to those, for example, possessing a weapon while under a domestic violence restraining order, as some have implied, I would be much more actively opposed.
To: Texas Federalist
Yes once they started down that slipery slope with so called "felons", they've expanded it to those not yet convicted of any crime - restraining orders. Then misdemenors with maximum sentence of over a year, regardless of what your actual sentence was. No doubt they will expand the definition of "people" even further. Who are "the people" mentioned in the Second Amendment? Are we returning to Negros = 3/5 of a person, women not really people, certain "special" classes not really people? What ever happened to "all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, amoung these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" - Declaration of Independence.
Oh, that old thing doesn't apply now a days! (/sarcasm)
18
posted on
01/10/2004 8:07:57 PM PST
by
TERMINATTOR
(DON'T BLAME ME! I Voted for McClintock)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson