Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheLion
Hazardous chemical elements (mercury, arsenic, lead, etc.) won't be eliminated by this process. It's not just the radioactive stuff. The pollution issues are similar to those of incineration of waste for energy.
13 posted on 02/28/2004 11:40:29 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
"Hazardous chemical elements (mercury, arsenic, lead, etc.) won't be eliminated by this process. It's not just the radioactive stuff"

You may be right but that is not what I remember reading. I'll try to find the article and get back to you.
16 posted on 02/28/2004 11:43:00 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"The only thing this process can't handle is nuclear waste," says Appel. "If it contains carbon we can do it."

http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/features/footnmouth/zwaste2.html
37 posted on 02/29/2004 10:26:33 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson