To: grundle
How much energy goes into the "thermal" part of this process,,,where does it come from?
7 posted on
02/28/2004 10:33:02 PM PST by
Waco
To: Waco
The key question!
9 posted on
02/28/2004 11:08:48 PM PST by
Weirdad
(A Free Republic, not a "democracy" (mob rule))
To: Waco; grundle
This process was in last May's (2003) Discover Magazine. I think the title was something like "Anything into oil". I remember it well because I was curious about where to buy the stock after reading the article.
They quoted $10 per barrel to start off. There were 3 bi-products of the proscess...oil was one. All were relatively ,harmless.
Anything but radioactive elements can be broken down. Pretty amazing. You will need to read the article, as I don't remember the details.
12 posted on
02/28/2004 11:36:44 PM PST by
TheLion
To: Waco
If it really could produce as much oil as it says, then it should become self sufficiant after a short while.
21 posted on
02/29/2004 12:23:25 AM PST by
Husker24
To: Waco
There was an article on this about a year ago posted here on FR. The system is only about 50-70% efficient. However we're talking trash here. If 30-50% is used to generate the power and 50-70% become oil (and other materials), do we really care about the lost 30-50%?
It's not a free lunch, but the cost is something we want to get rid of anyway. It would be a good deal if it was on 20% efficient.
24 posted on
02/29/2004 12:50:00 AM PST by
JosephW
To: Waco
32 posted on
02/29/2004 9:17:04 AM PST by
grundle
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson