Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

al-Qaeda still safe in Pakistan, say Afghans
The Times of India ^ | March 13 2004 | Associated Press

Posted on 03/14/2004 6:08:07 AM PST by knighthawk

SPIN BOLDAK: Despite a crackdown involving tens of thousands of troops and a pledge by President Gen. Pervez Musharraf to do all he can in the hunt for Osama bin Laden, Afghans say a steady stream of Taliban and al-Qaeda fugitives are finding a safe haven on Pakistan’s side of the 2,000-mile border.

The Afghan border chief gestures toward a fresh spray of bullet holes across his pickup truck, then points toward the place he says the Taliban attackers came from: Pakistan. “See the trees? They started from that border post,” said Palawan, his head shaved. Afterward, “the vehicles came from there, and took the Taliban away.”

Sealing the border is vital if a promised spring offensive by American troops is to succeed in its main goal, crushing Taliban resistance and capturing al-Qaeda leaders like bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, both believed in hiding somewhere along the porous frontier.

The US military has described the strategy as a “hammer and anvil” approach, with Pakistani troops moving into semiautonomous tribal areas on their side of the border, and Afghans and American forces sweeping the forbidding terrain on the other.

But Palawan and other Afghan security officials say they aren’t convinced, insisting Pakistan’s security and intelligence services are rife with Taliban and al-Qaeda sympathizers.

“They are living there, they are coming to do the terror attacks, and they are going back,” Palawan said, gun at his side as he drives along the barren border. Pakistani officials scoff at the charges and say they are doing everything they can to arrest Taliban and al-Qaeda fugitives.

“This is nonsense,” Pakistan information minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed said in Islamabad. “We are fighting against terrorists, not sheltering them.”

Pakistan can point to an impressive record: It has arrested more than 500 al-Qaeda suspects since the Sept. 11 attacks and it has recently deployed 70,000 troops to the tribal regions of Waziristan.

But Palawan is not alone in his suspicions, and Afghans have not forgotten the strong support Pakistan gave to the former Taliban regime before Musharraf abandoned them in favor of the United States just after the attacks on New York and Washington. Pakistan supplied money, arms and shelter to Islamic guerrillas, including the Taliban, during the guerrilla campaign in the 1980s against Afghanistan’s then-Soviet occupiers.

“Without Pakistan, the Taliban would be finished. Without the Taliban, al-Qaeda would be finished,” Gen. Khan Mohammed, regional commander of the Afghan militia, said in Kandahar, capital of the southern province that includes Spin Boldak.

Some Afghans say Pakistan’s security and intelligence services make a distinction between turning away al-Qaeda members many of them Arabs foreign to the region and turning away their former Taliban allies seeking shelter.

“I don’t think there’s been a fundamental shift in the perception of the Taliban in the Pakistan military,” said Vikram Parekh, an analyst with the International Crisis Group in Kabul. “That’s going to be the big problem,” whether Pakistan’s military “draws a line between al-Qaeda and the Taliban.”

Afghan intelligence officials say they have intercepted phone conversations from Taliban commanders in Quetta, the largest Pakistani city near the southern border.

Attackers have maintained a steady series of rocket, small-arms and bomb assaults on Afghan and US posts along the border and elsewhere in Afghanistan. Pakistan prohibits the 13,000 US troops in this country from crossing into its territory, but says it is rigorously hunting down terror suspects.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; afghans; alqaeda; alqaida; hammerandanvil; hammerandsponge; pakistan; southasia

1 posted on 03/14/2004 6:08:08 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...
Ping
2 posted on 03/14/2004 6:08:41 AM PST by knighthawk (I have started my journey, I'm drifting away with the wind, full of power I'm spreading my wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Good article. There is no doubt that Musharraff in a box and the Pakistani Intelligence Agency is totally infiltrated with Al Queda sympathizers. I think Musharaff's work is cut out for him but his tenure is short at best.
Tough situation but we need him.
3 posted on 03/14/2004 6:15:48 AM PST by Pedrobud (CNN sucks , so do the French !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pedrobud
Which is why we have to cross the border and do the job ourselves.
4 posted on 03/14/2004 6:21:44 AM PST by God luvs America (Howard Dean is a deranged lunatic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
This story was published and posted a couple of days ago under a different title. The earlier posting I think was a little longer, although I didn't make a detailed comparison.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1096580/posts


Any AP story that begins with the word "Despite . . . " is probably designed to be a hit piece. In this case the U.S. military had just formally announced the obvious, that a new, and major operation was under way along the border. Dear Ellen Knickmeyer, the writer of the "story" just had to do something to blunt the news.

That's not to say that there are not difficulties in the campaign. I've posted a few items from the Pakistan press that show the dithering that is going on in some quarters, but we've also seen that there have been some successes as well.

This AP story reminds me of all the stories we saw early in the war against the Taliban and AQ when the opposition leaders couldn't miss an opportunity to bad-mouth the U.S. military, until the Taliban regime collapsed.
5 posted on 03/14/2004 6:30:31 AM PST by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pedrobud
Tough situation but we need him.

That's what he'd like us to believe. But then we end up supporting a Military dictator who overthrew an elected government in a coup d'etat. We made teh same mistake with Saddam in the 80s. There are alternatives, democratic alternatives to Musharaff and his terroristt regime.
6 posted on 03/14/2004 10:28:48 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson