Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CLARKE'S COLLAPSE
New York Post ^ | 3/25/04 | RICH LOWRY

Posted on 03/24/2004 11:52:29 PM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:20:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: listenhillary
Thanks! These people are EVIL!
41 posted on 03/25/2004 2:53:06 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Lioness!
42 posted on 03/25/2004 2:58:11 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
This book looks to be something of a "C.Y.A." attempt in light of the fact Mr. Clarke was the counterterrorism expert in the Clinton White House. During the eight years he spent in that position we saw the first World Trade Center bombings, the bombing of US embassies around the world, the bombing of the USS Cole, the proliferation of al Qaida throughout the Muslim world and the repeated failure to capture Osama bin Laden even though foreign countries were offering him up on a sliver platter.
If I were Richard Clarke and I had presided over such incredible failures in counterterrorism I would be looking for a scapegoat as well.

Wow! This is a very strong indictment of Richard Clarke's "counterterrorism" career!

If I were Richard Clarke and I had presided over such incredible failures in counterterrorism I would be looking for a scapegoat as well.

The obvious conclusion!

43 posted on 03/25/2004 3:13:42 AM PST by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
hanoi john has kept quiet waiting to see if this grows legs then he'll jump on the ban waggon..dickie is fast loosing credibility as we FReepers dig up more counterdictions.
44 posted on 03/25/2004 3:52:23 AM PST by GailA (Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
ABC will be spinning this story because they hired Clarke as a consultant!
45 posted on 03/25/2004 3:55:17 AM PST by tapatio (Democrats adrenaline can fly into nut control.Beware!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
BTTT
46 posted on 03/25/2004 3:59:34 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl; The Rant
Frank Salvato is a FReeper whose screen name is TheRant. Thought I'd ping him to the posting of his terrific article even though he hasn't been around FR much in the past couple of months. :o)

47 posted on 03/25/2004 4:11:40 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago; Mo1
I agree. Clarke's testimony was certainly crafted to give the impression that he's a registered Republican. However, that's not what he said.

What he said was that when he went to vote in the Virginia primary, he asked for a Republican ballot. As I heard that, it struck me as an odd wording, unnecessarily precise if all he wanted to do was say he was a Republican. At that moment, I could hear the sound of tap shoes on the head of a pin.

Virginia does not require voters to declare party membership.


48 posted on 03/25/2004 4:16:47 AM PST by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
Has anyone checked voter registration records to see if Clarke is actually a registered Republican, as he claims to be?

I wouldn't doubt his claim. There are plenty of ambitious, blackmailed or bitter Republicans out there willing to sell their soul to the 'Rats. John McCain, Orrin Hatch, Arlen Spectre (misspelling intended) and Trent Lott quickly come to mind.

49 posted on 03/25/2004 4:19:09 AM PST by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: guitfiddlist
Not to mention the other "Republican" Wesley Clark.
50 posted on 03/25/2004 4:20:34 AM PST by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: FranklinsTower
I have a feeling that someone has bought off or intimidated Clarke.

Wonder if Simon & Schuster will reveal their full company name to be SOROS, Simon & Schuster.

51 posted on 03/25/2004 4:20:52 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Assume that GW Bush attacked al-quada on Jan 20, 2001 and killed binLaden. Would that have stopped the 9/11 attacks? I think not. The scenario for catastrophe was set up for 8 years prior to that and could not have been stopped. IMHO, Clinton's INS, FBI, CIA, and security groups failed to do what they were charged to do. To place blame at the feet of GW Bush, and his administration, for the 9/11 catastrophe is the heigth of hypocrisy. But then again, the democrats are good at that, now aren't they??????
52 posted on 03/25/2004 4:23:33 AM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
Good find. The Minnesota democrat he donated to, Steven Andreasen, was a Clinton NSA flack. Andreason is reported, in a Bill Gertz article, to have accused Clinton State Dept. lawyers of being disloyal to the president in rendering a legal opinion about negotiating anti-missile treaties with Russia.

53 posted on 03/25/2004 4:28:55 AM PST by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Jeff Greenfield is one of the "journalists" that met with Kerry in Franken's apartment. According to O'Reilly - who may at times come off as pompous but I believe really knows his stuff - says that this meeting was a coaching event. That not only did they ask Kerry questions, but then coached him on how to answer these questions.
54 posted on 03/25/2004 4:37:46 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FranklinsTower
I have a feeling that someone has bought off or intimidated Clarke. It is Scott Ritter all over again.

I have a feeling we are seeing bribe money oozing from every crack and pore of this farce of a commission. Some day it will all come out.

55 posted on 03/25/2004 4:39:20 AM PST by Puddleglum (Kerry is so very ... scary!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FranklinsTower
I have a feeling that someone has bought off or intimidated Clarke.

IMO no one bought off Clarke. He let his anger and ego take over, and then sold himself to the lowest bidder.

56 posted on 03/25/2004 5:30:21 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Here's the gist of Clarke's testimony:

Is it me or...?
57 posted on 03/25/2004 5:36:59 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FranklinsTower
Richard Clarke and Scott Ridder have been bought. But, by whom? The only people I know of who have huge, obscene amounts of money to throw around are liberal Democrats, or liberal Democrats who are married to spouses who have huge, obscene amounts of money to throw around. Ergo, they have been bought by one or more liberal Democrats. Whores come in all denominations.
58 posted on 03/25/2004 5:55:09 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Regretably, this fight is probably already lost and the stakes can be the election itself.

Republicans must win this issue of Bush's performance leading up to 9/11 or lose his main claim to re-election.

The Democrats need only a tie. That is, if Bush was no better than Clinton than Kerry would be no worse than Bush. If you watch the Dem talking heads, this seems to be right out of their talking points: Plenty of blame to go around and isn't a shame that Condi Rice is afraid to come clean with the American people.

The whole of the media is acting as if the Dems have already won by assuring at least a tie.

I believe they are right and Kerry didn't even have to come down off the hill.


59 posted on 03/25/2004 6:32:27 AM PST by nathanbedford (ATTACK, repeat, ATTACK, Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
re: Rarely has a former public servant with such a sterling reputation)))

??? Who knew or cared about this bench-wamer?

60 posted on 03/25/2004 6:33:35 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson