Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CLARKE'S COLLAPSE
New York Post ^ | 3/25/04 | RICH LOWRY

Posted on 03/24/2004 11:52:29 PM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:20:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

March 25, 2004 -- DEAN Acheson famously titled his memoir of his years as secretary of state after World War II "Present at the Creation." Anyone close to Richard Clarke these last few days could write a memoir called "Present at the Self-Immolation." Rarely has a former public servant with such a sterling reputation shot it all away so quickly.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: richardclarke; richlowry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2004 11:52:29 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Clarke committed perjury.

A review of the facts and other testimony surrounding events means:

There is no other possibility - hang him out to dry.

2 posted on 03/25/2004 12:35:05 AM PST by Enduring Freedom (Guess How We Ended Japanese Kamikaze Attacks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
Those darn hard copy packrats. Again, cheers for Jim Angle!!!!
3 posted on 03/25/2004 12:46:03 AM PST by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
I have a feeling that someone has bought off or intimidated Clarke. It is Scott Ritter all over again.
4 posted on 03/25/2004 12:48:16 AM PST by FranklinsTower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
Also, Clarke said -- *under oath* on Wednesday -- that ALL he said in his August 2002 press briefing was true.

Mr. Clarke's attempt to say that what he said during the August 2002 briefing *was true* but "he was emphasizing the positive", begs the question since what he said in 2002 *completely* contradicts what he asserts *now*...that Bush did little or nothing to go after Al Qaeda.

What he may have not have emphasized (implying there were negatives) in 2002 does not change the obvious...his present charges against Bush are NOT true..and he (in effect) said so under oath!
5 posted on 03/25/2004 12:48:56 AM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Has anyone commented on Clarke's irrational animus towards the President?

Guess the media is too busy talking up his so called republican credentials.

6 posted on 03/25/2004 12:51:59 AM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Has anyone checked voter registration records to see if Clarke is actually a registered Republican, as he claims to be?
7 posted on 03/25/2004 12:52:56 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Has anyone commented on Clarke's irrational animus towards the President? Guess the media is too busy talking up his so called republican credentials.

I was thinking the same thing as you. Not to mention he said about us needing to understand why the terrorists hate us -- what self-respecting Republican would ever say that! He supposedly claims he voted for Bush over Gore -- well, why would a "terrorism expert" who said that Clinton made it his No. 1 issue not vote for such a person's successor? Geez, this guy is just like a freeper troll -- his claims of being Republican don't pass even a simple smell test.

8 posted on 03/25/2004 12:59:03 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Looks like Cyberman caught a virus and is about to crash hard
9 posted on 03/25/2004 1:08:06 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
Jeff Greenfield said tonite that Clarke's testimony today will do great harm to the president because he's a republican.

The spin has begun in earnest and we must not let our guard down for one moment.

10 posted on 03/25/2004 1:12:01 AM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"In his 2002 briefing, Clarke said that the Bush administration decided in "mid-January" 2001 to continue with existing Clinton policy..."

Not to pick nits, but President Bush didn't take office until January 20th 2001 - so how was Clarke privy to the "Bush administration's" decisions in "mid-January" 2001...or was that Lowry's point?

11 posted on 03/25/2004 1:12:51 AM PST by Positive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
"Has anyone checked voter registration records to see if Clarke is actually a registered Republican, as he claims to be?"

According to Sid ... Clarke voted for McCain in the 2000 primaries

No mention of the general election

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2004/03/25/clarke/index_np.html

(Clarke, in fact, voted for Republican Sen. John McCain for president in the Republican primaries in 2000)
12 posted on 03/25/2004 1:13:30 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
(Clarke, in fact, voted for Republican Sen. John McCain for president in the Republican primaries in 2000)

That explains a lot. McCain is also one that bites the hand that feeds him.

13 posted on 03/25/2004 1:15:36 AM PST by Texasforever (I am all flamed out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
"Jeff Greenfield said tonite that Clarke's testimony today will do great harm to the president because he's a republican."

Would this be the same Jeff Greefield that had a meeting with Kerry??



O'Reilly Factor - Left-wing "reporters" met with John Kerry in Al Franken's apartment
03.22.04

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103384/posts
14 posted on 03/25/2004 1:17:53 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
That explains a lot

Yea .. but I'm still trying to figure out how Sid knew that bit of info?

15 posted on 03/25/2004 1:19:38 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Thanks for the reminder. Yes that Jeff Greenfield.

Freepers are the army of truth that will make sure no lie goes unchallenged!

16 posted on 03/25/2004 1:20:28 AM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Would that be the same Jeff Greenfield (and other "upstanding reporters"/sarcasm) who met with John Kerry at Al Franken's apartment in New York to coach him to be a better candidate?

They don't even get the benefit of the doubt from me any longer. Kerry might as well hire all of them for his press secretaries including loudmouth Chris Matthews (who hates President Bush & his administration with a passion).

17 posted on 03/25/2004 1:32:33 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Did ya see the nice act Chrissy did on tonight's show and not knowing what is in a talking points memo?

He really needs to brush up .. it wasn't very good
18 posted on 03/25/2004 1:38:02 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Well I can't tell if McCain is a Republican or Democrat so that doesn't really mean anything. Besides having Sidney Blumenthal trying to tell the the truth is about like trusting Bill Clinton with interns.
19 posted on 03/25/2004 1:38:57 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
According to Sid ... Clarke voted for McCain in the 2000 primaries
No mention of the general election

According to his testimony today, he only registered as a Republican in 2000, and, as you pointed out, that was to vote for McCain. But as far as the media is concerned, he's a lifelong Republican, the way Kevin Phillips is!

20 posted on 03/25/2004 1:40:57 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson