Replies

Also, Clarke said -- *under oath* on Wednesday -- that ALL he said in his August 2002 press briefing was true.

Mr. Clarke's attempt to say that what he said during the August 2002 briefing *was true* but "he was emphasizing the positive", begs the question since what he said in 2002 *completely* contradicts what he asserts *now*...that Bush did little or nothing to go after Al Qaeda.

What he may have not have emphasized (implying there were negatives) in 2002 does not change the obvious...his present charges against Bush are NOT true..and he (in effect) said so under oath!

O'Reilly had Wright Salisbury, a "peaceful" 9-11 family member, on his show last night who said Clarke admitted the comments from 2002 were a lie. It happened at the end of the segment and O'Reilly said something like "Well, he should have told us that from the beginning instead of us having to find it out". So much for the "no spin zone".

Grrrrrrrrrrrrr!