Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What say FReepers?

Lando

1 posted on 03/29/2004 10:48:03 AM PST by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lando Lincoln
What part of "no" do they (our elected officials and the U.N.) not understand? The U.N. can't even control the elements of a simple weapons inspection, their own personal greed, or their own organization, let alone the oceans that cover some +/- 70% of the planet Earth.


2 posted on 03/29/2004 10:56:48 AM PST by tomball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Under UN control a new supranational agency has been created called the Seabed Authority.
An apt name for the UN bottom dwellers.
3 posted on 03/29/2004 10:57:58 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
I say the treaty should rest on the Seabed, along with the UN and other post-relative materials.
4 posted on 03/29/2004 11:01:43 AM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
LoL, here's another article on the UN's trustworthiness.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1107299/posts

And the world will trust THEM with the seas?
7 posted on 03/29/2004 11:13:40 AM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln; Bikers4Bush; LiteKeeper; RickofEssex; bulldogs; Vigilanteman; ServesURight; ...
LOST PING.

On or off, let me know.
8 posted on 03/29/2004 11:15:01 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
The people behind the UN that want control of the seas are the same folks that controlled the seas when they owned and controlled Britain.

Who are they?

You find out!!
9 posted on 03/29/2004 11:16:39 AM PST by RISU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Will we let them get away with it? Will we see this massive piece of our liberty drown in the seas while we do nothing – again? A massive outcry of NO now will stop it. It just requires one phone call to your United States Senator. Here’s the number: 202-224-3121. Call it and stop the Law of the Sea Treaty and keep the seas of the world open and free – as they’ve always been.

Thanks for the suggestion. I'd pass it on to others. Just call your senator. Enough calls and the senate will kill this thing for sure.

10 posted on 03/29/2004 11:18:19 AM PST by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - Disturb, manipulate, demonstrate for the right thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Luger is a world government stooge.

He's never done a single thing for conservatives.
11 posted on 03/29/2004 11:24:17 AM PST by Finalapproach29er (" Permitting homosexuality didn't work out very well for the Roman Empire")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
This author STILL misses the most important aspect of this treaty. I'll just keep reposting this until people start to get it. The big issue with LOST isn't about the ocean; it's about land use control.

This global bureaucracy will justify control of land use to "protect" the marine environment. It isn't hard to see. Many oceanic species breed in estuaries within the United States. Estuarine health isn't doing very well for a number of reasons (many of which politicized science will conveniently miss). The estuaries are fed by rivers. The rivers are lined with cities.

Marine sanctuaries and global biospheres are model for what is planned for LOST. If all we accomplish is to alter the treaty to gain protection for our military, we will have missed the point.

LOST is a straitjacket fully capable of crippling this nation (which certainly affects its ability to defend itself). That the White House says it knows nothing about it belies the fact that, according to the email I get from ALRA, the White House and Chuck Hagel are the instigators in pushing this treaty through in the dark of night after the Reagan Administration had rejected it out of hand.


12 posted on 03/29/2004 11:26:51 AM PST by Carry_Okie (Privatization of environmental risk management is critical to national defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
And exactly who's Navy is going to be used to enforce this piece of crap ??
15 posted on 03/29/2004 12:23:24 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
BUMP
16 posted on 03/29/2004 12:24:27 PM PST by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Every single time I think this puppy is dead, it comes back to life. What on God's green earth makes the UN think that some land locked dictatorship in Eurasia or Africa has the same voice as coastal powerhouses? Why should Licenwhateverthehellstein have the same voice as India? Why would China even consider such a thing to be valid?

And why would Austrailia, which has the largest open ocean waters to exploit, even consider such a treaty?

I've made my calls, my wife has made hers, my in laws have made theirs, my parents have made theirs, my siblings have made theirs -- If you're reading this and assuming that is just enough, that your effort doesn't matter... Well, you're on the wrong system. Pick up the phone, spend the twenty cents, and tell your senators what you think.
18 posted on 03/29/2004 12:46:33 PM PST by kingu (Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
I wouldn't trust the UN to watch a stool sample. It is a greedy, power hungry instrument of evil.

"To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification."
Brock Chisolm, when director of UN World Health Organisation


19 posted on 03/29/2004 1:45:41 PM PST by appalachian_dweller (The RIGHT of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Can anyone name a UN success story?
22 posted on 03/29/2004 9:51:36 PM PST by Spruce (Retreat? Hell! We just got here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
HELL NO!
25 posted on 03/29/2004 11:17:45 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("Had to cool me down to take another round, now I'm back in the ring to takea-nother swing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
This is a dumb and stupid idea and these idiots in the senate need to get their butts ripped if they let it pass
27 posted on 03/29/2004 11:21:50 PM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Axiom Nine
ping
28 posted on 03/29/2004 11:23:14 PM PST by pax_et_bonum (Always finish what you st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
30 posted on 03/30/2004 7:37:58 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson