Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Address Iraq and Terrorism - Top Two Issues of Re-Election (Tues. 8:30PM EDT)
AP ^ | April 12, 2004

Posted on 04/12/2004 8:47:28 PM PDT by nuconvert

Bush to Address Iraq and Terrorism - Top Two Issues of Re-Election

Apr 12, 2004

By Deb Riechmann/ Associated Press Writer /

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush will work to defuse two issues in his prime-time news conference on Tuesday: rising casualties in Iraq and his response in 2001 to a terrorism warning the White House had in hand before the Sept. 11 attacks. Both issues are critical to Bush's re-election strategy, which is focused on the president's record on national security.

Bush plans to open the 8:30 p.m. EDT news conference - the 12th of his presidency, but only his third televised in prime evening viewing hours - with a statement on Iraq, White House communications director Dan Bartlett said Monday. He said the president will be prepared to address questions about a memo, titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.," that Bush received on Aug. 6, 2001.

"After a tough week, there are important questions that are on the minds of the American people," Bartlett said.

With the Sept. 11 commission hearings and the recent battles in Iraq being broadcast into American homes, this is a good time for Bush to defend his policies, said Stephen Hess, a political analyst at the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution. "This is an administration that gets in trouble because it doesn't speak up in a timely way and defend itself," Hess said. The news conference is "really quite necessary," he said.

On Monday at his Texas ranch, Bush deflected questions about the pre-Sept. 11 warning, telling reporters that if the FBI had known about an imminent terrorist attack against America, the agency would have told him.

Still, he added that now might be the right time to "revamp and reform our intelligence services."

To questions about whether the security situation in Iraq was untenable, Bush replied: "The situation in Iraq has improved."

The president's upbeat assessment was based on a fragile cease-fire in Fallujah. The predominantly Sunni Muslim city west of Baghdad has been the site of fighting between insurgents and American troops after a mob mutilated the bodies of American security contractors killed in a March 30 ambush.

U.S. troops have killed about 700 insurgents across Iraq since the beginning of the month. About 70 coalition troops - almost all Americans - have died in clashes.

"A civil society, a peaceful society can't grow with people who are willing to kill in order to stop progress," Bush said. "And our job is to provide security for the Iraqi people so that a transition can take place."

Vice President Dick Cheney said in Tokyo on Tuesday that the administration will soon announce its choice as U.S. ambassador to the new Iraqi government. Paul Bremer has been the chief American civilian official in Baghdad, running the provisional authority there.

Karlyn Bowman, who does research on public opinion and politics at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington, said Bush knows there is widespread anxiety throughout the United States about instability in Iraq.

"He has to convey being in charge and having a clear plan of what's ahead," Bowman said. "And I'm sure he will express compassion for the families" of those killed in the fighting.

"I think on 9-11, the president has to reiterate that they would have done much more if they would have had specific information," she said, adding that most Americans were not anxiously awaiting the release of the Aug. 6, 2001 memo, part of the President's Daily Brief. "I'm still not sure the public is in the mood to point the finger."


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; iraq; speech; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2004 8:47:29 PM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
"America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins."
2 posted on 04/12/2004 8:54:12 PM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( President Bush 3-20-04))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Hope he mentions Iran by name...........


3 posted on 04/12/2004 8:55:53 PM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( President Bush 3-20-04))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
So the economy, I see, is not one of the two top issues anymore. Interesting.
4 posted on 04/12/2004 9:05:19 PM PDT by Cosmo (If Iraq is Bush's Vietnam, then Ted Kennedy is Bush's Jane Fonda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
If the top two issues are Iraq and Terrorism. Kerry is in deep, deep do-do
5 posted on 04/12/2004 9:06:49 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
If the top two issues are Iraq and Terrorism. Kerry is in deep, deep do-do

His Misery Index is off the charts....

6 posted on 04/12/2004 9:17:22 PM PDT by lorrainer ("I don't do nuance." -- GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
I think they mean Bush's top 2 issues.(what Bush and his people feel are his top 2 arguments for re-election.
7 posted on 04/12/2004 9:20:18 PM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( President Bush 3-20-04))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: nuconvert
Last month the "jobless recovery" and the economy were the major issues. The war on terror and Iraq were at 16% or some ridiculous level like that. Now it's ALL we care about?
9 posted on 04/12/2004 9:29:46 PM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
We're fickle.
10 posted on 04/12/2004 9:34:04 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert; All
Any chance that Bush might have a big announcement, or at least something to take the smug smiles of the faces of certain journalists?

Any senior WH sources lurking?
11 posted on 04/12/2004 10:02:19 PM PDT by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spotsy
No, Bush has allowed his enemies, ie the press and the Dems, to define his presidency of late. It's all been reacting and on the defensive since the bogus National Guard issue. Bush has had an inept re-election campaign and poor control of the bully pulpit. His poll #s suck, anyone here who thinks being consistently in the low to mid 40s is a good thing because Kerry is down there too is folling themselves.
12 posted on 04/12/2004 10:05:56 PM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spotsy
The only thing that he could do that would be correct is call off these damn cease fires and get on with killing Arabs.

Bush's low profile is becoming a problem. He's got to get off the defensive and enunciating his Iraq policies to the Amurican pimples....forcefully and with no equivocation.

13 posted on 04/12/2004 10:22:18 PM PDT by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Uh . . .

Latest Polls:

Rassmussen Reports (4/9-4/11)

Bush's Approval Rating: 53%

CNN/Time (4/8)

Bush's Approval Rating: 49%

CNN/Gallup/USAToday (4/5-4/8)

Bush's Approval Rating: 52%

Newsweek (4/8-4/9)

Bush's Approval Rating: 49%

14 posted on 04/12/2004 10:22:48 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain; zarf
I agree that Bush has kept too low a profile in the past 3 months.

He shouldn't be out there every day reacting to the headlines, but he should be doing something to get his message out.
15 posted on 04/12/2004 10:30:11 PM PDT by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Righty1; nuconvert
May I suggest that your post #8 is going over the limit?
16 posted on 04/12/2004 10:37:55 PM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
"I'm still not sure the public is in the mood to point the finger."

But you'd better believe the RATS are!

17 posted on 04/12/2004 10:39:19 PM PDT by upchuck (Pay attention!! This tagline changes on an irregular schedule and without prior warning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Here's another one that is carrying things way too far.

"get on with killing Arabs"

Because they are Arabs? Because they speak Arabic? Christian Arabs too?
18 posted on 04/12/2004 10:40:28 PM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff
Fair enough. Islamofascists would be a better term.
19 posted on 04/12/2004 10:43:14 PM PDT by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zarf
That distinction I can live with. It is a particular brand of ideology that motivates our enemy. The defeat of that enemy is what this is all about.
20 posted on 04/12/2004 10:46:52 PM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson