Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/24/2004 11:47:17 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2

bump


2 posted on 06/25/2004 12:41:27 AM PDT by lowbridge ("You are an American. You are my brother. I would die for you." -Kurdish Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
In a follow-up interview with Mr. Connaughton, I asked him about the commercial side of the treaty that establishes for the first time a commercial venture called the "Enterprise" that will charge $250,000 for the right to mine the ocean sea beds. Since this is a U.N. Treaty, proceeds will go to the U.N.

Just what the UN needed...more open doors for corruption.

3 posted on 06/25/2004 12:43:32 AM PDT by lowbridge ("You are an American. You are my brother. I would die for you." -Kurdish Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"When I asked about if the purpose of the Law of the Sea was to protect history, he said, "It is one very successful component of implementation because whenever someone discovered a missing ship from history, they had total rights to it.""

Translation--"we can't have those nasty capitalists getting their hands on the gold and other goodies from sunken Spanish ships".

5 posted on 06/25/2004 3:24:36 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Doesn't this treaty have some serious military implications? Something about making it illegal for submarines to travel while submerged under certain circumstances. Also aren't there restrictions on the activities of naval vessels like needing U.N. permission to be in international waters? I thought parts of this treated were designed to keep the U.S. navy from going outside U.S. waters or some such nonsense. Anyone have info on this?


8 posted on 06/25/2004 5:58:25 AM PDT by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Why not just contract with the Mafia to provide municipal police forces?

9 posted on 06/25/2004 6:07:47 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The only place in the world where there was essentially no law was the open sea.

Now they are planning to remedy that little loophole.

11 posted on 06/25/2004 9:00:08 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2; Bikers4Bush; LiteKeeper; RickofEssex; bulldogs; Vigilanteman; ServesURight; ...

Geez, I'm out of touch for 3 days and look what happens!

So the most corrupt organization in the world that has pulled of the most expensive rip off of taxpayer and public money(oil for food) is in charge of the oceans. Which means they are in charge of commerce, oil, natural resources (mining) and fishing.

Just great.

I ask you to please personally contact your senators and get in writing how they voted for it. We need to keep track of these people and vote the internationalists out of office.


12 posted on 06/25/2004 5:48:10 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
if property rights are to be associated, they can be done in arrangement with science.

By property rights they mean resource development rights. This is probably how outer space property rights will go as well.

13 posted on 06/25/2004 5:50:20 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: farmfriend; Carry_Okie; Jeff Head; Noumenon; redrock; AuntB; GrandmaC; EBUCK; marsh2; Movemout; ...

sad ping.


16 posted on 06/25/2004 6:10:31 PM PDT by sauropod (Which would you prefer? "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" or "I did not have sex with that woman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Is it too late to write our senators? I still don't understand why the U.S. or the administration would be in favor of it.


25 posted on 06/25/2004 8:24:58 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
In a follow-up interview with Mr. Connaughton, I asked him about the commercial side of the treaty that establishes for the first time a commercial venture called the "Enterprise" that will charge $250,000 for the right to mine the ocean sea beds.

It all comes down to another way for the UN to make money. The UN is shameless.

28 posted on 06/25/2004 8:28:12 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Evil doesn't want to leave you alone. It wants to draw you in and force you into complicity. - Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2; editor-surveyor; farmfriend; A. Pole; shrinkermd; isthisnickcool; sauropod
I venture that since the Law of the Sea is a done deal that this new agreement will be made part of the Law of the Sea legislation – or perhaps it will be the other way around. Since "we the people" have become nothing more than serfs with government collecting our tax dollars and using them without representation, it is our freedoms, using the treaty's acronym, that have been LOST!
====================================
Guys, This is a bet on which you can "bet the farm". Or lose it. Peace and love, George.
34 posted on 06/26/2004 4:40:06 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson