Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SauronOfMordor
"Just what we don't need is for the UN to get its own independent source of income -- "

I'm glad to see that there is at least one other person out there who sees this for what it is.

We also don't need the U.N. (through the various and numerous "treaties") to destroy our sovreignty, either.

10 posted on 06/25/2004 8:58:35 AM PDT by Designer (Sysiphus Sr. to Junior; "It was uphill, all the way, both ways!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Designer

Gulf of Mexico is chuck full of historical wrecks. I guess we can't drill for oil because UN will say the Gulf of Mexico is a historic site. UN will be telling what we should do in US waters and might have to change ports so we don't disturb a sunken Santa Maria. How would this effect US submarine service going on patrol? Will our enemy hide behind historical site?

Don't sign it. Don't we already have "Laws of the Sea"? It's been working fine for years.


39 posted on 06/26/2004 7:49:28 AM PDT by Milligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson