[91B]

But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you don’t believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; there’s no there there.

I almost pity the Dems-not having a Mark Steyn.

Almost.

[infowarrior]

I almost pity the Dems-not having a Mark Steyn...

When one takes into account that the closest they actually do have is Al Franken, then...

the infowarrior

[Brian Allen]

<< But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you don’t believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; there’s no there there.

I almost pity the Dems-not having a Mark Steyn. >>

But the dims DO, of course, have Mark Steyn.

And it is not the absence of 'a Mark Steyn' that defines them -- but rather it is the inability to handle Mark Steyn's insistence of promulgating and disseminating only Truth.

Yep.

They got them a Mark Steyn -- no problem -- just ain't got no Truth.

Blessings -- Brian

[Thanks for the ping, Pokes]