Monday-Morning Quarterback - The comfort of hindsight

The Bush campaign has hammered away at John Kerry as an incorrigible flip-flopper, but hasn't said enough about a related Kerry vice: His tendency to be a Monday-morning quarterback who offers up 20/20 hindsight as though it were wisdom and foresight.

Consistent with the Democratic party's love for liability law, Kerry is a stereotypical ambulance chaser. He waits for something to go wrong — the war in Iraq, the shortage of flu shots at home, anything — and then leaps forward to criticize and to smugly insinuate that he "would have" done better.

"When it comes to Iraq," Kerry declared, "I would have done almost everything differently." Of course, Kerry constantly proposes his alternatives after the fact, not before, when it might matter and when he might have to bear responsibility or blame.

Kerry wonders why, given our failure to find weapons of mass destruction, the president doesn't join him in saying that the invasion of Iraq was a mistake. But the issue is totally misconceived. The question is not, as Kerry puts it, whether in light current information we should have invaded, but whether invading was the right call — indeed, the only call — given what was known at the time. A true leader must make decisions in real time, often with imperfect and incomplete information, and he must take responsibility for his actions.

Bush, not having the luxury to spin and fine-tune his arguments in light of history, recognized that if America decided in favor of preemptive war, better to do it sooner than later: U.N. sanctions and weapons inspections had failed; U.S. forces could be poised for attack for only so long; and Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, if indeed they existed, needed to be eliminated before they became operational.

Kerry, who supported the original war resolution, now criticizes Bush's actions as hasty — even though he and other Democratic leaders, including Clinton and Gore, repeatedly warned about Saddam's WMDs throughout the 1990s. In 1992 Gore even chastised the first President Bush for not reigning in Saddam's WMD program — as Kerry, no doubt, would also have done in 2004 had President Bush not acted.

In an interview with Diane Sawyer of ABC News, Kerry was asked whether he thought the Iraq war was "worth it." Kerry, despite his initial support, said no: "We should not have gone to war knowing the information we know today." Sawyer, just to be sure, followed up with: "So it was not worth it?" Oh well, Kerry answered, it all "depends on the outcome ultimately and that depends on the leadership." Sawyer, incredulous, wondered aloud: "So if it turns out okay, it was worth it?"

In that moment, Kerry revealed the depth of his cynicism and opportunism, as well as his utter unfitness for command.

NRO should be hammering the NBC story. They aren't. And I'm willing to bet they all knew yesterday that the NYTs story was bunk and could have debunked it quickly , but were too busy congratulating themselves over at the Corner.

People in the MSM know NRO and respect it. NRO could have hit back hard, but didn't. It's a trend I've been watching for a long time and it's come home to roost.

The disappearance raised questions about why the United States didn't do more to secure the Al-Qaqaa
facility 30 miles south of Baghdad and failed to allow full international inspections to resume after the
March 2003 invasion.

But Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said coalition forces were present in the vicinity of the site both
during and after major combat operations, which ended May 1, 2003 — and searched the facility but
found none of the explosives material in question. That raised the possibility that the explosives had
disappeared before U.S. soldiers could secure the site in the immediate invasion aftermath.

The Pentagon would not say whether it had informed the nuclear agency at that point that the
conventional explosives were not where they were supposed to be.

Al-Qaqaa is near Youssifiyah, an area rife with ambush attacks. An Associated Press Television News
crew that drove past the compound Monday saw no visible security at the gates of the site, a jumble of
low-slung, yellow-colored storage buildings that appeared deserted.

"The most immediate concern here is that these explosives could have fallen into the wrong hands," IAEA
spokeswoman Melissa Fleming said.

The agency first placed a seal over Al-Qaqaa storage bunkers holding the explosives in 1991 as part of
U.N. sanctions that ordered the dismantlement of Iraq's nuclear program after the Gulf War.

IAEA inspectors last saw the explosives in January 2003 when they took an inventory and placed fresh
seals on the bunkers, Fleming said. Inspectors visited the site again in March 2003, but didn't view the
explosives because the seals were not broken, she said.

http://wcco.com/topstories/topstories_story_300075944.html

________________________________________________________

Note to IAEA, never trust a brutal dictator. Break seals and check for yourself.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.