Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our man sold [how to make nuke bomb] secrets to Iran, admits Pakistan
telegraph.co.uk ^ | 13/02/2005 | Massoud Ansari

Posted on 02/12/2005 9:54:05 PM PST by Destro

Our man sold secrets to Iran, admits Pakistan

By Massoud Ansari in Islamabad

(Filed: 13/02/2005)

Pakistan has conceded for the first time that Dr A Q Khan, the rogue nuclear scientist who is under house arrest in Islamabad, passed secrets and equipment to Iranian officials and is now considered the "brain" behind the programme that has put Teheran on the brink of acquiring nuclear weapons.

An investigation by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency, details of which have been disclosed to The Telegraph, confirmed that Khan, a hero in Pakistan as the "Father of the Bomb", and his associates sold nuclear codes, materials, components and plans that left his "signature" at the core of the Iranian nuclear programme.

The admission came during private talks in Brussels at the end of last month between European Union officials and senior ministers from Pakistan and India. The EU officials were told that cooperation between Teheran and Khan, 68, and associates from his Khan Research Laboratories began in the mid-1990s and included more than a dozen meetings over several years.

Most of these meetings were between Mohammad Farooq, a centrifuge expert from KRL, and Iranians in Karachi, Kuala Lumpur and Teheran. Pakistani investigators have told the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that centrifuge drawings acquired by Iran closely resemble the design of the first-generation Pakistan-1 centrifuge.

Khan also helped the Iranians to set up a secret procurement network involving companies and middlemen around the world, ISI investigators found. The IAEA told Pakistani officials that centrifuges they had discovered at the Doshan Tapeh military base in eastern Teheran closely resembled the more advanced Pakistan-2 centrifuges.

Apparently motivated by Islamic zeal in addition to financial gain, Khan, who was arrested in November 2003, devoted more than a decade to the spreading nuclear technology around the world. With increasing focus in Washington on a showdown with Iran, Khan's activities are being viewed with growing alarm.

Pakistan had previously resisted admitting Khan's role in Iran's nuclear plans for fear of diplomatic repercussions. It remains reluctant to co-operate fully with either the IAEA or President George W Bush, who has pressed Pervez Musharraf, the Pakistani President, to allow the CIA to interrogate Khan.

The IAEA has not yet found conclusive evidence that Iran has a weapons programme and Teheran claims that it "plans to enrich only to the levels that are used to generate nuclear fuel". A CIA report, however, concluded this was a lie.

The ISI found that Khan and his associates had approached some potential buyers of weapons of mass destruction, including Saddam Hussein's regime. "Iraqi officials initially agreed but later backed out because they thought it might be a sting operation or a ploy by the US to implicate them," said one official.

Pakistani investigators found that Khan's network tried not only to satisfy existing demand but also to create new markets for their proliferation activities. "They started working it both ways. They provided options to those who wanted to buy this sensitive material but also developed new markets for their wares."

Western diplomats believe that Pakistan is afraid that making Khan available to the CIA directly would lift the lid on an extensive network of its army officers loyal to Khan. "This could expose the role of the Chinese in this international black market, or that of other countries that Pakistan cannot afford to antagonise," said an official involved in the investigations.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aqkahn; aqkhan; cia; iran; khan; nuclearsecrets; nukes; pakistan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2005 9:54:05 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jb6

What? Not Russia?


2 posted on 02/12/2005 9:54:50 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Looks like this is a "dupe",from a previous post?


3 posted on 02/12/2005 9:56:35 PM PST by El Oviedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro

They'd better make damn sure Iran doesn't get the opportunity to nuke somebody. They're downwind from our retaliation.


4 posted on 02/12/2005 9:56:45 PM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Shoo,stick to the official line.Pakistan is a devoted American ally & AQ Khan is a rogue who somehow manages to get C-130s to transfer nuke parts without the honest Pakistani army knowing!!


5 posted on 02/12/2005 9:58:43 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Nukes only are good as a deterrent - defensive rather than offensive - they have little value as a first strike weapon unless you have USSR numbers. --- If your sane that is.
6 posted on 02/12/2005 9:59:57 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Destro

I might believe Pakistan is sane (just stupid). Iran is definitely way off the crazy chart.


7 posted on 02/12/2005 10:01:25 PM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
But unlike Pakistan - Iran has some form of democracy - and the people want change there. Of course a democratic Iran would not necessarily want to be nuke free. Democracy doe snot mean pacifism.
8 posted on 02/12/2005 10:05:40 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Iran does not have a form of democracy. They have a pretense of very limited representation, nothing more. The mullahs make all the major decisions, and wield all the institutional power. Pakistan has far more of a democratic history (though a sordid one, I'm afraid) than Iran.


9 posted on 02/12/2005 10:12:52 PM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Nukes are the problem. Enriched Uranium is the problem. It is not out of the realm of possibility of some entrepreneurial physicists getting the enriched uranium and building their own weapons. And lets not forget, these are the same people that financed, trained, and directed Hezbollah to attack the marine barracks in Lebanon with 12000lbs of explosives.


10 posted on 02/12/2005 10:19:46 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Iran does have legit elections - true those elected have limited power - but an Iranian is better off than a Pakistani in terms of freedom - especially religous minoroties and women (not saying much in that dept).

Pakistan is a failed state - Iran has potential.

11 posted on 02/12/2005 10:21:28 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

Meh, Actually I meant that nukes aren't really that problem and that Iran launching nukes from their territory is not the problem.


12 posted on 02/12/2005 10:21:55 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

What does Beruit have to do with it?


13 posted on 02/12/2005 10:23:03 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Pakistan is a failed state-but on lifesupport from the US,China & it's Arab benefactors.


14 posted on 02/12/2005 10:27:20 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Destro
You have to realize that this administration is full of pissed off ex-Reganites.

Now your Scottish so I don't know if this means anything to you or if I'll get the analogy right, but what if the US supported the IRA through training and funding and directed them to attack Great Britain or whatever with one of the biggest blasts ever used in an terrorist attack. Then twenty years later when we still support those terrorists that we say we want some nukes.
15 posted on 02/12/2005 10:28:31 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

Why would they not be angry from the hostages time? We should have went to war with Iran then and there - even of theyfreed our hostages as a matter of national honor. In any case it is true that this admin is more scared of Iran than it is of North Korea. Maybe because they feel the Chinese keep the North Koreans on a leash but Iran has no leash.


16 posted on 02/12/2005 10:32:57 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator; Destro

Gee, didn't we hear the same crap from the same bunch oh say 2 years ago? Guess some Islamic things never change.


17 posted on 02/12/2005 11:11:15 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Islam =/= sane.

Don't put anything past a devoted islamic..

18 posted on 02/12/2005 11:12:53 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator; Destro

A "democratic" Iran would not necessarly be our ally. Democracies can go to war, it's rarer but it happens, and when you add nationalism or worse Islam to the mix, who knows.


19 posted on 02/12/2005 11:14:31 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Velveeta; SevenofNine; lacylu; DAVEY CROCKETT; jerseygirl; Donna Lee Nardo; ...

Ping


20 posted on 02/12/2005 11:15:48 PM PST by nw_arizona_granny (The enemy within, will be found in the "Communist Manifesto 1963", you are living it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson