Napalm in the morning ping list!
To: gopwinsin04
"US Requests Super Bunker Busting Missiles That Could Destroy Iran's Nuke Sites" Your request is:
GRANTED ! ! !
2 posted on
03/01/2005 7:42:15 AM PST by
Enterprise
(President Bush thought Wead was a friend. Turns out he was just a big fat tape worm.)
To: gopwinsin04
One would imagine that those bunker busters would work in N Korea and any other communist country with nuclear capability.
3 posted on
03/01/2005 7:42:28 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
To: gopwinsin04
4 posted on
03/01/2005 7:43:57 AM PST by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
To: gopwinsin04
13 posted on
03/01/2005 7:54:09 AM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: gopwinsin04
17 posted on
03/01/2005 7:59:27 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
To: gopwinsin04
I prefer the US Requests Super Mullah Busting Missiles That Could Destroy Iran. PERIOD.
21 posted on
03/01/2005 8:06:36 AM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: gopwinsin04; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator The RNEP
Hummmmm Not a very acronym friendly name.
How about we call it the --- Find Underground Compounds Kill Enemies Rocket?
To: gopwinsin04
The United States wants to develop the capability to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities with air strikes. We have them, they are called sub-surface burst nukes.
29 posted on
03/01/2005 8:20:40 AM PST by
Centurion2000
(Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
To: gopwinsin04
termed the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Hehehehehe...
Does anyone know why we can't repeatedly bomb the site with conventional weapons?
43 posted on
03/01/2005 8:40:55 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: gopwinsin04; hchutch
Actually, the most likely reason this weapon became a requirement are Yamantau and Kosin'sky Mountains in Russia, which are crucial command-and-control nodes for Russia's strategic nuclear forces.
50 posted on
03/01/2005 8:51:18 AM PST by
Poohbah
("Hee Haw" was supposed to be a television show, not a political movement.)
To: gopwinsin04
Bombs away!!
52 posted on
03/01/2005 8:58:00 AM PST by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: gopwinsin04
Since fallujia (sp?) and supposedly they evac'ed everyone but the terrorist, I was wondering why the Neutron bomb wasn't used to clear the area. Would have been faster (meaning in 2 weeks you can return) and less loss of US lives.
2000 lb bunker buster or 5 Kilo ton nuke??
To: gopwinsin04
Using Nukes to take out their nukes?
Tactically maybe, but as strategy? I think this will backfire and create greater desire for non-nuke countries to aquire large arsenals.
To: gopwinsin04
I think that we have bunker busting nukes that can already do this job, but I understand why we might want a conventional missle that can do the same thing.
To: gopwinsin04
I'm wondering why we can't just use multiple conventional bunker busters, with one hitting every 90 seconds till you get deep enough. With GPS guidance, we should be able to pretty much put 'em in, one after the other. Sort of like taking bites out of steak until your done with it, rather than trying to wolf it down all at once.
Hopefully those with a lot more smarts than I with regards to this scenario can let me know if this would work or not.
Best Regards
Sergio
60 posted on
03/01/2005 9:53:10 AM PST by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
