Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The leftist judiciary will come up with anything to protect infanticide!
1 posted on 07/03/2005 11:11:53 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cpforlife.org

Pro-life Ping!


2 posted on 07/03/2005 11:12:16 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

But...but...I thought the left wanted free speech??


3 posted on 07/03/2005 11:15:58 AM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (FAKE conservatism is more dangerous than liberalism <<<---at least you know what you're gonna get!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

This isn't even an abortion matter. This is trampling free speech yet again.


5 posted on 07/03/2005 11:18:25 AM PDT by Alexander Rubin (You make my heart glad by building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Well, he did say they wouldnt let the pro-abortion groups hand out anything either. So I guess its fair at least.


7 posted on 07/03/2005 11:21:16 AM PDT by Begferdeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

It's a school. They should be there to learn, not to debate.


8 posted on 07/03/2005 11:21:21 AM PDT by YoungHickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
I guess the pro-sticking-scissors-into-the-skulls-of-unborn-kids crowd didn't feel they could counter with progagnda as strong.

Perhaps they could discuss those mythical "victims of back-alley abortions" from the "bad old days" when mothers weren't allowed to kill their own children.

10 posted on 07/03/2005 11:23:53 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
So this judge said the policy that prohibits the girl from handing out pamphlets is unconsitutional, but the judge still prohibited her from doing it?

I'm so confused.

13 posted on 07/03/2005 11:26:29 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

It's a public school. The 1st Amend guarantee of free speech applies.


14 posted on 07/03/2005 11:26:52 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Killing babies and gay marriage are the two sacraments of the Left. They believe in them with religious fervor.


15 posted on 07/03/2005 11:27:51 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

This is the appropriate result, in my opinion, according to supreme court jurisprudence. As long as it's a blanket prohibition on distributing any and all pamphlets, that's a content neutral restriction on free speech. Additionally, schools have been held by the Court to not be public forums for speech, since restricting speech there can serve an important government interest (you know...kids learning to spell).

Just a comment on the jurisprudence...nothing more...


20 posted on 07/03/2005 11:37:44 AM PDT by Grn_Lantern (Let's go to work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
But it's okay to have "a day of silence" for persecuted "gay" people and have the school sneak the kids off to a planned parenthood clinic for birth control stuff.
22 posted on 07/03/2005 11:39:38 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"Permitting pro-life and pro-choice literature to be distributed by students in the school hallways would turn the school hallways into a battlefield," Covington wrote in the order.

Right. School is about killing time, not pursuing truth, particularly with regard to life and death issues.

Imagine interupting algebra class for this!

33 posted on 07/03/2005 11:54:32 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
saying the divisive issue could turn the hallways into a "battlefield."

But indoctrination is permissible and is not a devisive issue. So, who are the intolerant ones? Of course, the ones who would turn the hallways into a battlefield.

35 posted on 07/03/2005 12:12:44 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I don't see the leftism here. The ruling is spot-on. If you give one side of the debate the freedom to distribute pamphlets, you're going to have to allow the other side the same opportunity.


40 posted on 07/03/2005 12:40:46 PM PDT by Melas (Lives in state of disbelief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

There is always the public sidewalk, outside the school.


43 posted on 07/03/2005 3:38:58 PM PDT by Tax Government (Put down the judicial insurrection. Contribute to FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
I wonder if this school teaches sex education with the premise that if you get pregnant, then abortion is the thing to do...

If they teach sex education, this student should have the right to show both sides at the school, and not the Planned Parenthood side (who openly endorsed John Kerry with Federal Tax dollars).

49 posted on 07/03/2005 6:41:46 PM PDT by topher (One Nation under God -- God bless and protect our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I agree with the judgement. Schools are not open free speech zones. There is a need for order and decorum the authority of the Principal to set as his will with reason.


50 posted on 07/03/2005 6:41:48 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"Permitting pro-life and pro-choice literature to be distributed by students in the school hallways would turn the school hallways into a battlefield," Covington wrote in the order.

That's funny. Aren't the sex-ed classes and the school clinic which refer young girls to Planned Parenthood for birth control, or taking care of their little "problems", pro-abort in their bent?

It's only a battlefield, I suppose, if both sides are presented.

57 posted on 07/03/2005 9:33:03 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
If she wanted to hand out NOW leaflets explaining how choice is being pro-feminists, there would be no need for school censorship. Its just like the skrools and black-robed despots to join to protect young charges from ideas that might be dangerous to the liberal agenda. I can't say I'm surprised at how this ruling came down.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
60 posted on 07/03/2005 11:42:56 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

later pingout.


64 posted on 07/04/2005 1:58:29 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson