The leftist judiciary will come up with anything to protect infanticide!
1 posted on
07/03/2005 11:11:53 AM PDT by
wagglebee
To: cpforlife.org
2 posted on
07/03/2005 11:12:16 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
But...but...I thought the left wanted free speech??
3 posted on
07/03/2005 11:15:58 AM PDT by
Stellar Dendrite
(FAKE conservatism is more dangerous than liberalism <<<---at least you know what you're gonna get!)
To: wagglebee
This isn't even an abortion matter. This is trampling free speech yet again.
5 posted on
07/03/2005 11:18:25 AM PDT by
Alexander Rubin
(You make my heart glad by building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: wagglebee
Well, he did say they wouldnt let the pro-abortion groups hand out anything either. So I guess its fair at least.
To: wagglebee
It's a school. They should be there to learn, not to debate.
To: wagglebee
I guess the pro-sticking-scissors-into-the-skulls-of-unborn-kids crowd didn't feel they could counter with progagnda as strong.
Perhaps they could discuss those mythical "victims of back-alley abortions" from the "bad old days" when mothers weren't allowed to kill their own children.
10 posted on
07/03/2005 11:23:53 AM PDT by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
To: wagglebee
So this judge said the policy that prohibits the girl from handing out pamphlets is unconsitutional, but the judge still prohibited her from doing it?
I'm so confused.
13 posted on
07/03/2005 11:26:29 AM PDT by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: wagglebee
It's a public school. The 1st Amend guarantee of free speech applies.
14 posted on
07/03/2005 11:26:52 AM PDT by
spunkets
To: wagglebee
Killing babies and gay marriage are the two sacraments of the Left. They believe in them with religious fervor.
To: wagglebee
This is the appropriate result, in my opinion, according to supreme court jurisprudence. As long as it's a blanket prohibition on distributing any and all pamphlets, that's a content neutral restriction on free speech. Additionally, schools have been held by the Court to not be public forums for speech, since restricting speech there can serve an important government interest (you know...kids learning to spell).
Just a comment on the jurisprudence...nothing more...
20 posted on
07/03/2005 11:37:44 AM PDT by
Grn_Lantern
(Let's go to work...)
To: wagglebee
But it's okay to have "a day of silence" for persecuted "gay" people and have the school sneak the kids off to a planned parenthood clinic for birth control stuff.
22 posted on
07/03/2005 11:39:38 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: wagglebee
"Permitting pro-life and pro-choice literature to be distributed by students in the school hallways would turn the school hallways into a battlefield," Covington wrote in the order. Right. School is about killing time, not pursuing truth, particularly with regard to life and death issues.
Imagine interupting algebra class for this!
33 posted on
07/03/2005 11:54:32 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: wagglebee
saying the divisive issue could turn the hallways into a "battlefield."But indoctrination is permissible and is not a devisive issue. So, who are the intolerant ones? Of course, the ones who would turn the hallways into a battlefield.
35 posted on
07/03/2005 12:12:44 PM PDT by
taxesareforever
(Government is running amuck)
To: wagglebee
I don't see the leftism here. The ruling is spot-on. If you give one side of the debate the freedom to distribute pamphlets, you're going to have to allow the other side the same opportunity.
40 posted on
07/03/2005 12:40:46 PM PDT by
Melas
(Lives in state of disbelief)
To: wagglebee
There is always the public sidewalk, outside the school.
43 posted on
07/03/2005 3:38:58 PM PDT by
Tax Government
(Put down the judicial insurrection. Contribute to FR.)
To: wagglebee
I wonder if this school teaches sex education with the premise that if you get pregnant, then abortion is the thing to do...
If they teach sex education, this student should have the right to show both sides at the school, and not the Planned Parenthood side (who openly endorsed John Kerry with Federal Tax dollars).
49 posted on
07/03/2005 6:41:46 PM PDT by
topher
(One Nation under God -- God bless and protect our troops)
To: wagglebee
I agree with the judgement. Schools are not open free speech zones. There is a need for order and decorum the authority of the Principal to set as his will with reason.
50 posted on
07/03/2005 6:41:48 PM PDT by
bvw
To: wagglebee
"Permitting pro-life and pro-choice literature to be distributed by students in the school hallways would turn the school hallways into a battlefield," Covington wrote in the order. That's funny. Aren't the sex-ed classes and the school clinic which refer young girls to Planned Parenthood for birth control, or taking care of their little "problems", pro-abort in their bent?
It's only a battlefield, I suppose, if both sides are presented.
57 posted on
07/03/2005 9:33:03 PM PDT by
Lexinom
To: wagglebee
If she wanted to hand out NOW leaflets explaining how choice is being pro-feminists, there would be no need for school censorship. Its just like the skrools and black-robed despots to join to protect young charges from ideas that might be dangerous to the liberal agenda. I can't say I'm surprised at how this ruling came down.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
60 posted on
07/03/2005 11:42:56 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
64 posted on
07/04/2005 1:58:29 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson